GTG: 1917-D Standing Liberty Quarter

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Santinidollar, Jun 25, 2020.

  1. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    NGC graded this. Now, it’s your turn!

    0978C381-56B8-4E3F-8E3F-539EAD2101F5.jpeg F233055B-78F7-4554-8BAA-F3EF0BD4DEE3.jpeg
     
    Nathan401 and capthank like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

  4. orifdoc

    orifdoc Well-Known Member

    MS64, not FH
     
  5. kSigSteve

    kSigSteve Active Member

    My guess is 58. It looks like there is some luster disturbance on her left hip next to WE. It also looks like some wear on the eagle wings.

    Only other thing I see is what appears to be some dirt in the letters and devices which to me hints that it spent some time circulating.
     
    capthank and Santinidollar like this.
  6. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

  7. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

  8. serdogthehound

    serdogthehound Well-Known Member

  9. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

  10. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    MS63 not FH
     
    johnmilton and Santinidollar like this.
  11. Dima

    Dima Member

    Lovely SLQ. MS63. I agree with folks it doesn't appear to be FH based on the photos. Looks like the holder is scuffed right where you'd expect to see headband feathers for FH.
     
    coinsareus10 and Santinidollar like this.
  12. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    Good you brought that up. There is a bad scuff on the holder in the head area.
     
  13. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

  14. Hambone1946

    Hambone1946 Well-Known Member

  15. LRC-Tom

    LRC-Tom Been around the block...

    63, Not FH. I was trying to determine whether I see a tiny bit of wear on the high points, but I finally decided this was not rub. If I saw the coin in hand, I might have to change my mind
     
  16. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    63, just short of FH.
     
  17. bradgator2

    bradgator2 Well-Known Member

    This is exactly where I am. My official vote is also 63, not FH. But I could easily see that it might be 58.
     
  18. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    Yes, it could an AU-58 too. The duller spots could wear or envelope toning. That’s why grading from photos is imprecise.
     
  19. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    I am going with wear, slight but "circulated" AU58
     
  20. schnickelfritz48

    schnickelfritz48 Well-Known Member

    To me, it's obvious this coin has slight wear in several areas, head and shield on the obverse and along the eagle's wing and breast on the reverse. AU-58.
     
  21. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page