I relented then gave it a 64 instead of 63. I'm still learning, and I learned plenty on the '82-S. Comparing my NGC MS63 to that one, I got a very good deal.
I should have said that it has pale golden toning on the obverse, that does not photograph well at all.
I'm at MS65+ on this one. It looks really clean and nice. I didn't make a guess on the CAC part. I think it would CAC but I don't know if it has been submitted or not. The toning makes it really hard to get a good look at the fields in the photos. It might go 66 but I'm content at 65+
I wish I had a better closeup of the obverse. It appears to me something on the face, but cannot see well. The reverse is a good 65/66, but obverse carries more weight in grading these. If the "line" I see across her nose and cheek aren't there, I would go with 65+ or 66.
I don’t know if you saw earlier, but the devices on the obverse and the top fields have golden toning.
I saw that, and see the gold. I am talking about a dark streak cutting across her lower nose and middle of her cheek. Could very well be on plastic or in the photo. Pretty coin, traditional coin folder toning. If the mark I see is not there or is a light scuff, I stand by my guess of 65+ or 66, and very well CAC. Its nice. If I could see it in hand, you might convince me 66+.
Thanks so much. I admit to being a pretty bad coin photographer. I asked for help, after all these years, now that I have lots of time at home.