It looks like a good call on a Die State (I). Oddly enough, it looks like I may have one that I called S-121c because I thought it had a partially diagonal reeded edge rather than either beaded or gripped. Take a close look at the stem of B.
I'm actually leaning toward NC-1. Spacing on LIBERTY seems too wide, and the top of the 1 is lower down from the hair than on 121.
Anyone want to take a stab at this one? Supposed to be an 1804, but I'm not knowledgeable enough to say either way, and you guys are walking encyclopedia's... (seller's images)
1804s attributable only by the CUDs with no date seem to be running about $300, but there has been about a 20% drop in the market recently so it could be as low as $240. I would probably be a buyer at the low end of that price range so consider that disclosure. If some of the 4 were showing it would quickly double or even triple. The planchet does look above average for a low grade Cent with no major corrosion distracting from it. This would be considered BS-1 (EAC) or P-1 (TPG) with better detail in some areas. Uneven wear always presents a challenge so it could be considered Fr-2 by some.
That is actually a pretty nice example, for the grade, of S-266C. I think I would grade it a little higher than PO-1, as the reverse still displays some nice detail.
I was just going by Heritage Auction Records. The visible 4 makes a ton of difference. But this is nice for a dateless example.
I need to check my eyes again. All I see is a touch of the 0 and smudges. Of course there is no question about the attribution with the diagnostic reverse die break. The question was about the difference in value from one that could only be identified by the break and one where the date was visible, so with two of you seeing the date it makes it higher.