Attribute This

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Marshall, Jan 5, 2017.

  1. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    It looks like a good call on a Die State (I). Oddly enough, it looks like I may have one that I called S-121c because I thought it had a partially diagonal reeded edge rather than either beaded or gripped. Take a close look at the stem of B.
    upload_2020-6-23_18-35-7.png
     
    TypeCoin971793 likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

  4. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    I'm actually leaning toward NC-1. Spacing on LIBERTY seems too wide, and the top of the 1 is lower down from the hair than on 121.
     
  5. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    I did an image overlay, and it matched S-121. Maybe @justafarmer can confirm?
     
  6. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    Did you have an overlay of the NC-1?
    I'm leaning with Conder right now:
    1797 NC-1 DATE-vert.jpg
     
  7. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    A new pickup. A little damage on each side but an R5 for just over $100. S-111 Obverse.jpg S-111 Reverse.jpg
     
    NSP and TypeCoin971793 like this.
  8. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

  9. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    I was using the seller’s pics. I will use mine shortly
     
  10. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    S-121. Perfect match. Look at dentils above LIBERTY

    34C9455F-4ABB-4B0C-8A4C-2CD1057E3C05.png 5D044991-266A-4758-8D5D-8508389366DB.png 22BE7490-5A0F-4013-83B3-5BA78187B019.png 64061716-AAB9-4726-8710-03F767B560BB.png

    NC-1. Date and TY noticeably do not line up.

    9E2B2E8D-7D8A-4DB8-B339-D26B83DDD26B.png D1F5BAC9-78AA-4282-8BD1-2CABDA699983.png 0D123D4A-A1D5-4EF1-82CC-819E32C78D0C.png 37F31692-EB2D-44C2-8BCA-4844F0010D61.png BCD93578-AFDD-4C64-9EB7-C0568CD63DD7.png
     
  11. Beefer518

    Beefer518 Well-Known Member

    Anyone want to take a stab at this one? Supposed to be an 1804, but I'm not knowledgeable enough to say either way, and you guys are walking encyclopedia's... (seller's images)

    1804 obv.jpg 1804 Rev.jpg
     
    NSP and TypeCoin971793 like this.
  12. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    The reverse die break and fraction look right

    9230FC28-8EC3-4B05-9901-54B71A2360AC.jpeg
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  13. Beefer518

    Beefer518 Well-Known Member

    Ok, cool!

    Estimated value?
     
  14. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    1804s attributable only by the CUDs with no date seem to be running about $300, but there has been about a 20% drop in the market recently so it could be as low as $240.

    I would probably be a buyer at the low end of that price range so consider that disclosure. If some of the 4 were showing it would quickly double or even triple.

    The planchet does look above average for a low grade Cent with no major corrosion distracting from it.

    This would be considered BS-1 (EAC) or P-1 (TPG) with better detail in some areas. Uneven wear always presents a challenge so it could be considered Fr-2 by some.
     
  15. Eduard

    Eduard Supporter**

    That is actually a pretty nice example, for the grade, of S-266C.
    I think I would grade it a little higher than PO-1, as the reverse still displays some nice detail.
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  16. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    I wish that were true. They tend to go for double that

    I’d grade it FR/AG
     
    Magnus87 likes this.
  17. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    I was just going by Heritage Auction Records. The visible 4 makes a ton of difference. But this is nice for a dateless example.
     
    HoledandCreative likes this.
  18. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    I can see the date in the pics. I’d bet it would be much stronger in hand
     
  19. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    That would definitely make a lot of difference.
     
  20. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    I can see the date as well, and it is no question an 1804 even if you couldn't see the date.
     
  21. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    I need to check my eyes again. All I see is a touch of the 0 and smudges. Of course there is no question about the attribution with the diagnostic reverse die break.

    The question was about the difference in value from one that could only be identified by the break and one where the date was visible, so with two of you seeing the date it makes it higher.
     
    Last edited: Jun 25, 2020
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page