ID help on some ancient coins

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by CoinDoctorYT, Jun 21, 2020.

  1. CoinDoctorYT

    CoinDoctorYT Well-Known Member

    So this is a bit embarrassing, but I don't know what these two coins are. I mean, I have a pretty good idea but I don't know where to start regarding attribution. Both of these coins I got good deals from Ebay, and they are currently en-route to me. I have attributed them to an extent. I guess I'm just braindead today because I should know what these are.

    I guess I'm just second-guessing myself.

    IMG_2695.JPG
    NERO, 54-68 A.D.
    Denarius
    Rome mint: 66-67 A.D.
    Laureate head to right of Nero, around IMP NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS.
    Jupiter seated left on throne, holding thunderbolt and sceptre, IVPPITER CVSTOS around.
    Reference: cf.S.1943, RIC 64, BMC -, RSC 121
    | just check me on this one |

    IMG_2694.JPG

    Roman republic
    Denarius
    Cornelius Scipio Asiagenus
    106 BC, head of Jupiter left
    Jupiter in quadriga right, s in field above,
    Crawford 311/1c; RSC Cornelia 24
    | not sure if this is correct too |



    This seller on both was ignorant and provided no attribution.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 22, 2020
    Bing likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    On the top one, I have no idea if it is Nero or who it might be. On the reverse though, to the left who whoever is sitting, I see AVG which wouldn't mesh with your attribution. I could be wrong. The coin is is pretty bad shape.

    I won't mess with the 2nd one since I know even less about Roman republic stuff.
     
    Justin Lee likes this.
  4. Cachecoins

    Cachecoins Historia Moneta

    The top one is obviously Nero.
     
    CoinDoctorYT likes this.
  5. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    Can you enlighten me as to how you can tell? I'm having trouble since portrait is all mashed up.
     
  6. Cachecoins

    Cachecoins Historia Moneta

    The portrait, while mangled, still has his distinctive features.
     
  7. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    I believe you. I only have one provincial of Nero and he looks nothing like that portrait. What say you about the reverse?
     
  8. Herodotus

    Herodotus Well-Known Member

    I believe that your 2nd coin may be:

    L. Memmius Galeria. 106 BC. AR Serrate Denarius Rome mint.
    O: Laureate head of Saturn left; harpa to right
    R: Venus driving biga right, holding scepter and reins; above, Cupid flying left, holding wreath
     
    CoinDoctorYT and DonnaML like this.
  9. RichardT

    RichardT Well-Known Member

    Justin Lee likes this.
  10. CoinDoctorYT

    CoinDoctorYT Well-Known Member

    Thank you guys for your help and opinions. The Nero one is tough, but thanks for your input.
     
  11. Justin Lee

    Justin Lee I learn by doing

    Nero later in his reign (earlier on he looks like a member of the Beatles) is often shown with a very thick neck, round and chunky jowls, and his back-of-head and neck hair (below the laureate ties) is long and curving inward into his neck.

    Check out the first handful in this search.

    Or this AE:
    [​IMG]
    Nero, Ruled 54-68 AD
    AE As, Struck 65 AD, Rome mint

    Obverse: NERO CAESAR AVG GERM IMP, Laureate head of Nero right.
    Reverse: Victory alighting left, wings spread holding shield inscribed SPQR, S-C across field.
    References: RIC I 312, Sear 1976
     
  12. CoinDoctorYT

    CoinDoctorYT Well-Known Member

    Ya I know that. I have been studying ancient coins for 3 years now. My question was to fact check the coins since they are already attributed and since they are in pretty rough shape.
     
  13. Justin Lee

    Justin Lee I learn by doing

    Good eyes, and nice call out!

    With FF2's tip, I'd agree with this choice.
     
    CoinDoctorYT likes this.
  14. CoinDoctorYT

    CoinDoctorYT Well-Known Member

    With FF2's tip, I'd agree with this choice.[/QUOTE]

    I agree as well. The alignment in that reference seems much more accurate.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page