The only thing harder than trying to grade a proof coin from photos is taking decent photos of a proof coin in a slab. These need work but I think show the true color of the toning decently. GTG on this ANACS slab if you want.
My initial impression was PF66, but I have a proof Franklin that looks much like that and is PF67. So tough to grade proofs from photos, who knows.
Correct I just sold a proof 67 Washington 1962 that had turned blue as such....i personlly dont care for that type of tone on a coin. It tend to be a nice color but it does tone evenly....the quarter was a nicly hammered strike, both obv. And rev. Devices were frosty. However being in that slab it most probably would grade up to 68. Or at least graded a +/* on the asigned grade.
I guess 66, but if any hairline scratches, then a 64. The coin was probably fully brilliant when graded, but will eventually turn dark brown all over being in that ANACS slab.
Paul nailed it right out of the gate. But most of you were spot on or 1 grade off. As stated previously proof coins are tough to photograph and even tougher to grade from photos.
Razz, I agree with you, modern proofs are tough to photograph. Cameo proofs are much easier to work with because of the contrast, & if the coin is toned the job should be easier. I shot the Franklin pictured below a couple of years ago.
