1961 Washington Quarter - Proof or Not?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by CamaroDMD, Jun 14, 2020.

  1. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    OK. I'm about 98% sure this coin is a proof but I wanted to see what you thought. It has fairly reflective surfaces that have been muted by golden toning. Strike is sharp...but not as sharp as you'd traditionally see with proofs (but I do know that proof Washington's from this era aren't known for crazy sharp strikes). It also has the RDV-002 reverse...meaning it's either a proof or a Type B business strike.

    Again, I'm pretty sure it's a proof but I just wanted a second set of eyes to look at it. I'm starting the process of putting together a Washington set and I was going through the coins that I have as a starting place. I found this one loose in the bottom of a container.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    I'm thinking a normal Business Strike Quarter. IMHO
     
  4. Mike185

    Mike185 Well-Known Member

    I agree with paddy on this. The details on the hair and feathers are not there for a proof...

    edit: nice coin!!!
     
  5. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

  6. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    What you have here is a business strike, with a proof reverse .
    https://www.washingtontype-b.com/
     
  7. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    I understand that it is a RDV-002. But, the surface appearance and strike depth looks like a proof to me. This has a more mirror type finish than a normal business strike in my eye...it's just muted by the toning.

    But, look at the difference in strike quality. Top photo is the reverse of the coin in question. Bottom photo is a known 1961 business strike with the RDV-002 "Type B" reverse. I think the strike of the top coin looks way more like a proof.

    [​IMG]
     
  8. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    The top image, the devices blend in with the field .
    Where the second image, the devices look highlighted ( proof ) ..
     
  9. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    The second image is not a proof. It’s a 100% business strike.
     
    Rick Stachowski likes this.
  10. gronnh20

    gronnh20 Well-Known Member

    The original coin you posted is a proof.
     
    Rick Stachowski likes this.
  11. Skyman

    Skyman Well-Known Member

    That's a tough one. As I have said in the past, I am not a collector of Washington proofs, so I'm not sure about their year to year characteristics.

    The reverse obviously comes from a proof die, but the fields also have that "liquidy" look associated with a proof. I have seen that look on 1961 business strike coins, but it is uncommon. OTOH, there's nothing about the obverse that particularly screams proof to me. That's the sort of coin I'd like to see in hand to make a judgment.
     
  12. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    In hand it “feels” like a proof. The fields have a more mirrory appearance than the other 1961. I tend to think it is in fact a proof which has toned up a bit.

    Like I said before, I found it loose in the bottom of a container of coins I’ve had for years and haven’t a clue where it came from. I wish I knew where I had gotten it.
     
  13. Danomite

    Danomite What do you say uh-huh

    It appears to be business strike with a type B reverse.
    http://doubleddie.com/273301.html
    I
    wonder how the TPG’s can tell the difference between a proof and a proof like in this variety.
     
  14. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    It looks like a proof to me.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page