GTG: 1859 Indian Head Cent

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Santinidollar, Jun 9, 2020.

  1. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    Try this one. Graded by PCGS.

    1608508A-811D-4908-8801-3D1006B405C4.jpeg 76038EB9-F284-4C7C-A6A3-C56C40EFD36B.jpeg
     
    DEA and GH#75 like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. kSigSteve

    kSigSteve Active Member

    64RB

    Beautiful first year IHC
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  4. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    64RB. Beautiful coin!
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  5. ddoomm1

    ddoomm1 keep on running

    MS-65RB
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  6. hotwheelsearl

    hotwheelsearl Well-Known Member

    65 from me
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  7. bradgator2

    bradgator2 Well-Known Member

    I’m going a different route.... AU58.
     
  8. toned_morgan

    toned_morgan Toning Lover

    These pictures are tough to tell... I'm going to follow bradgator and say AU58. Still a nice coin!
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  9. Publius2

    Publius2 Well-Known Member

    I grade it a 58 but I think it's slabbed at 64.
     
    Santinidollar and chascat like this.
  10. kanga

    kanga 65 Year Collector

    BTW, FE's and CuNi IHC's do NOT have the color attached to their grades.
    No RD, RB or BN.
    That's just the way it's done.
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  11. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

  12. schnickelfritz48

    schnickelfritz48 Well-Known Member

    From the pics, AU-55 - 58, somewhere in that range. Need to view the pics from a couple of slightly different tilts to get a better view of whatever wear exists. I can't even clearly tell if the coin has the 4 diamonds or not from the photo.
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  13. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

  14. ddddd

    ddddd Member

  15. bikergeek

    bikergeek Active Member

    I'm saying 58 based on what looks like rub, although the rub may be on the holder. But I wouldn't be surprised if @Publius2 called it by suggesting it may be holdered in a 64 slab...
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  16. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    Time for the reveal

    D1FD7133-E18D-4FC9-A068-6AC3C8404600.jpeg
     
    bradgator2 likes this.
  17. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    I was going to say MS-64, but I guess the rub marks under the "TY" in "LIBERTY" took it down this level. This one of those coins that says, let's crack it out and spin the wheel of fortune again.

    NGC graded this one MS-64 about 20 years ago.

    1859CentO.JPG 1859CentR.JPG
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  18. Coinman since 1957

    Coinman since 1957 New Member

    That's why 'certifying" coins is only for the inexperienced. Makes money for their opinion and takes away from your pocket with no guarantee of same grade each time you "try again" A game for suckers....
     
  19. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    No it isn’t. There’s much more to it than the assigned grade. I purchase quite valuable coins from overseas. Do you think I’d do it if they were all raw? No guarantee? No cert lookup screen? No auction records?
     
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2020
    Santinidollar likes this.
  20. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    That's not true in many ways. Try selling raw high end coins. It would limit the buyers and bids. It's not wise to ignore the value of the grading services.
     
    johnmilton and CamaroDMD like this.
  21. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    I was in the 55-58 camp. Looked close at the luster and said 58. Nice coin
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page