Natural or artificial toning?

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

I say AT, but it is still attractive.

 

I’m at AT although I don’t doubt it could land in a market acceptable holder.

The elevation chromatics don’t look right to my eye. The colors also seem to lack any true pattern progression.

Still a nice looking example and attractive. I’d like to see a photo of it in a different light. This one seems juiced.

 

It's not mine. Photos were pulled from eBay.

 

It’s still a nice example. What’s the grade?

 

Nice looking but AT.

 

It's raw for $500

 

Sure is pretty but I wouldn't touch it, especially for $500!

 

Someone will buy it an either be happy if it straight grades or be very upset when it gets an UNC Details Quest. color. It won't be me though.

 

AT. It was gassed. Pretty, but not market acceptable.

 

First impression is AT. Reading on to see a $500 price tag on a raw coin, not only is it AT, but the ATer also gave up on getting it in a holder.

 

El oh el! A fool and his money . . .

 

It's either AT...or the photos are really juiced (or both).

 

If it's raw then you probably already have your answer. But it could get in a holder some day... maybe?

 

I would think it would be detailed right away for QC.

 

AT

 

Remember when I said it was attractive? It’s not that attractive!

 

NCG sure would grade it MS70 any day of the week :-D

 

ANACS will grade it: MS60 AT

 

AT