Is this a "No D" or a "Weak D"?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by mlov43, May 31, 2020.

  1. mlov43

    mlov43 주화 수집가

    Is this a 1922 "No-D" Lincoln Cent?
    Or a "Weak D?"
    This coin appeared in an auction recently...
    Screen Shot 2020-05-31 at 5.03.14 PM.png
     
    capthank likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. AdrienH

    AdrienH Yet Another YN

    I see a D.
    Weak D.
     
    Inspector43 likes this.
  4. CommemHalfScrub

    CommemHalfScrub Active Member

    +1
     
  5. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I'm not seeing a D at all.
     
  6. mlov43

    mlov43 주화 수집가

    It looks like it was on the losing of a axe fight, but I don't think this is a "weak D."
     
  7. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor

    Looks like it "could" be die #2
    http://www.lincolncentresource.com/1922Ddievarieties.html

    but I am always suspicious when there are odd lines in the area of the mintmark, as a skilled person could remove the 'D' and expect they would not be noticed on such a dinged up coin. Good Luck. IMO, Jim
     
    mikenoodle, mlov43 and Kevin Mader like this.
  8. smarch

    smarch Active Member

    No D I'm thinking
     
    mlov43 likes this.
  9. Kevin Mader

    Kevin Mader Fellow Coin Enthusiast Supporter

    I'm with Jim...Die #2. A clear close-up of the date would help though.
     
    mlov43 likes this.
  10. LRC-Tom

    LRC-Tom Been around the block...

    I see it as Die Pair #2 also: no "D". All the obverse diagnostics fit. But it's more than a bit surprising that the reverse isn't stronger. Could it maybe be a very skillful counterfeit?
     
    mikenoodle and mlov43 like this.
  11. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Weak D and Improperly Mixed alloy ;)
     
    Charles REid likes this.
  12. mlov43

    mlov43 주화 수집가

    whoa. WHY "weak D?"
     
  13. Kevin Mader

    Kevin Mader Fellow Coin Enthusiast Supporter

    Yes...I was a little concerned about the wear on the coin being artificial. But the alloy issue lends to material issues with the period, so it's bending both ways. Strong Reverse though.
     
  14. halfcent1793

    halfcent1793 Well-Known Member

    Many years ago, it would have been a no D. Now, it is a weak D. Unless it is die pair #2 with the strong reverse, it won't bring no-D money.
     
  15. nuMRmatist

    nuMRmatist Well-Known Member

    Need a CLOSE-UP of left wheat ear ...
     
  16. Phil's Coins

    Phil's Coins Well-Known Member

    Die pair 2 possibly, BUT,that particular die pair usually has a strong reverse. Counterfeit? Maybe hard to tell without hands on.
     
  17. nuMRmatist

    nuMRmatist Well-Known Member

    Usually hard to tell, but 1 error common to Chinese [?] '22 plain, and to '55 DD is pretty easy to spot...
     
  18. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    Looks good to me, but, hey, I wear glasses.

    :)
     
    nuMRmatist likes this.
  19. Evan8

    Evan8 A Little Off Center

    It is a die pair 2. L in Liberty butts up against the rim. WE is mushy while TRUST is sharp. Second 2 in date is sharper than the first 2. All signs of a Die pair 2 obverse.

    On the reverse, people assume that it is a weak reverse when the wheat lines aren't present but the real sign is the O in ONE. It is sharp and not flattening out at the top. The weak reverses always show die wear on the O.

    This coin is a die pair 2 No D for sure.
     
  20. nuMRmatist

    nuMRmatist Well-Known Member


    I have to wear glasses now, AND, I didn't eat my carrots last night .
     
    juris klavins likes this.
  21. mlov43

    mlov43 주화 수집가

    Why doesn't the Lincoln Cent Resource mention this "real sign" then?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page