As title states, picked up a new SLQ this past weekend to round out my SQL type set. Newest addition is a 1917 type 2, graded PCGS MS62FH. This rounds out my SQL collection nicely - 1917 type 1, 1917 type 2, and 1930 type "3." Technically, type 2 ran 1917-1924 and type 3, which included a recessed date, ran 1925-1930. However, many books will consider the type "3" as type 2, with recessed date. In my opinion, I consider these three distinct types/coins. Exceptionally pleased with this addition to my collection. Created a PCGS showcase to highlight the 4x coins: https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/showcase/7394
Hi Dima, Beautiful example & nice group. Seems as though the 1917's, both types were well struck. Guess they were especially proud of the design....all that is, except Barber! I own the 1917-P T-I MS-66, 1917-S T-I MS-65 & 1917-P T-II MS-65...guess I need to get back at it...LOL! J.T.
Yeah, I bet Barber was rather displeased that three of his designs were being replaced; all at once. I agree, they do seems very well struck - aside from the FH designation, many other details appear strong, even in lower MS grades. For examples, the creases/flow of Liberty's dress, the detail on the shield, texture of the walls on both sides of Liberty, etc. I'm very pleased with this addition! The three silver ladies look absolutely fantastic together
Yeah, I think most people consider them to be three distinct subtypes. There was clearly a major design revision in 1924. That's a great little subtype set! Congrats.
Thanks Yes, the design definitely adjusted beyond the recessed date. I think it's most evident if you you look at the rim denticles. On type 1 and 2, you see and rim and then the .._ _.. pattern; whereas on the type 3, the rim is so very thin, it is almost absent and replaced with the .._ _.. pattern.
They are a beatiful design.....as a kid I had a paper route ,now understand all my change was silver, buffalo,and war nickels ....bills us notes, silver certs. Every standing liberty in circulation in the early 60's was wore so bad....I always wanted a real nice one.
Whoa @Paddy54 - that's a really nice one! 65/66 FH? I've only ever found one SQL while searching a roll of quarters. It was worn to the point where the date was illegible and the reeded edge was nearly smooth.
I was hoping for.....this is a piece that's not for sale ever.....well after I'm dead you all can fight over it but until.....it's mine. I may just take it with me eternity it a long time to collect.
Unfortunately the wear on the high points (especially Liberty’s legs/knees) limit this coin to AU58, but it’s certainly a very nice and lustrous FH SLQ! I like the toning and would prefer this one over any “white” MS quarter.
