I'll say no bean. Not that I'm biased by sending my last 20 work years at the University of Oklahoma and the commemorative is Texas!
Looks original surfaces to me with some light toning and only a couple of small ticks on the obverse. I'd say yes to the bean.
Rd. 1: 1921 MS 65 Green CAC Morgan--> Yes: 4 vs No: 3 Rd. 2: 1835 AU 50 Green CAC 50c--> Yes: 2 vs No: 8 Rd. 3: 1939-S Oregon MS 65 Gold CAC 50c--> Yes: 10 (8 Green and 2 Gold) vs No: 0 Rd. 4: 1838 AU 58 Green CAC (Gold $5)--> Yes: 1 vs No: 5 Rd. 5: 1908 MS 63 Green CAC (Gold $20)—> Yes: 5 vs No: 1 Rd. 6: 1885-CC MS 63 PL Green CAC Morgan--> Yes: 8 vs No: 1 Rd. 7: 1946-S MS 66 Green CAC Walker 50c--> Yes: 7 (6 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 1 Rd. 8: 1885-S MS 62 NOT CAC Morgan--> Yes: 5 (4 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 1 Rd. 9: 1830 EF 45 UNKNOWN CAC 50c--> Yes: 10 vs No: 1 Rd. 10*: 1899 MS 65 BN UNKNOWN CAC 1c--> Yes: 4 vs No: 5 Rd. 11: 1942 MS 65 Gold CAC 50c--> Yes: 4 (4 Green and 0 Gold) vs No: 2 Rd. 12: 1940-D MS 67 Star UNKNOWN CAC 10c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 4 Rd. 13*: 1884-O MS 61 Gold CAC $1--> Yes: 9 (4 Green and 5 Gold) vs No: 0 Rd. 14: 1827 AU 55 CAC 10c--> Yes: 1 vs No: 7 Rd. 15: 1851 MS 66 CAC 1c--> Yes: 5 vs No: 4 Rd. 16: 1919-S MS 65 Green CAC 10c--> Yes: 12 (11 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 0 Rd. 17: 1922 MS 65 NOT CAC Peace $1--> Yes: 10 vs No: 1 Rd. 18: 1851 Au 58+ CAC 1/2C--> Yes: 0 vs No: 6 Rd. 19: 1839-O AU 53 NO CAC 50c--> Yes: 6 (5 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 3 Rd. 20: 1920 MS 65 NO CAC 25c--> Yes: 4 vs No: 6 Rd. 21: 1862 PF 64 CAC H10c--> Yes: 5 vs No: 1 Rd. 22: 1869 PF 63 Gold CAC 10c--> Yes: 7 (5 Green and 2 Gold) vs No: 0 Rd. 23: 1834 XF 45 CAC $5--> Yes: 2 vs No: 5 Rd. 24: 1835 XF 40 CAC 25c--> Yes: 8 (7 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 2 Rd. 25: 1876 MS 62 Not CAC 50c--> Yes: 7 (6 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 1 Rd. 26: 1853 MS 64 Not CAC 10c--> Yes: 7 vs No: 0 Rd. 27: 1913 MS 62 CAC 2.5 Gold--> Yes: 1 vs No: 5 Rd. 28: 1835 AU 58 CAC 10c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 7 Rd. 29: 1908-S MS 64 CAC 1c--> Yes: 9 vs No: 2 Rd. 30: 1913-D MS 66+ CAC 5c--> Yes: 10 vs No: 0 Rd. 31: 1829 AU 55 NOT CAC 5c--> Yes: 11 vs No: 1 Rd. 32: 1851 MS 61 CAC 2.5 Gold--> Yes: 4 (3 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 2 Rd. 33: 1936-D MS 66 GOLD CAC 5c--> Yes: 3 (3 Green) vs No: 2 Rd. 34: 1941-S AU 55 NOT CAC 10c--> Yes: 11 (2 Green and 9 Gold) vs No: 0 Rd. 35: 1924 MS 66 CAC 25c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 4 Rd. 36: 1936-D MS 67 Texas UNKNOWN CAC 50c--> Yes: 8 vs No: 1 Rd. 37: 1928 MS 66 Oregon UNKNOWN CAC 50c--> Yes: 9 vs No: 0 Rd. 38: 1893 MS 64 Isabella CAC 25c--> Yes: 2 vs No: 9 Rd. 39: 1820 AU 58 CAC 10c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 7 Rd. 40: 1881-S MS 65 CAC $1--> Yes: 7 (3 Green and 4 Gold) vs No: 0 Rd. 41: 1940 PR 66 CAC 50c--> Yes: 7 vs No: 0 Rd. 42: 1824 AU 50 CAC 50c--> Yes: 8 vs No: 1 Rd. 43: 1937 Texas MS 66 CAC 50c--> Yes: 5 vs No: 2 Green CAC on coin and deserves it: 15 Green CAC on coin and doesn't deserve it: 10 Gold CAC on coin and deserves it: 1 Gold CAC on coin but should only be Green: 4 Gold CAC on coin but should not sticker: Failed to sticker but deserves a sticker: 7 Failed to sticker and should not sticker: 1 Unknown sticker status and deserves a sticker:3 Unknown sticker status and does not deserve a sticker:2 Note: if we don’t know the status of a coin before the reveal and more people say green CAC for a gold CAC coin, then it will go in the area of “Gold CAC on coin but should only be Green” ....see round 3 as the example case * Rd. 10 was 4-4...I interpreted that CircCam would consider it a no (based on a similar example), which swayed the overall vote to a lean towards no. Rd. 13 was tied between green and gold at 4-4...I interpreted that geekpryde would consider it a gold
It is near impossible to grade proofs, especially older proofs from photographs, but given the grade is PR63, I am going to say it did get a green bean.
I agree with the others, for PR63 it is solid so green it is. I wouldn't be surprised if it was under graded and should be a PR64.