Error or post mint?

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

That's a cool retained lamination!

 

Yup, that is a great lamination error!

 

Yeah takes a minuite to adjust the details but yup lamination error a very nice one.

 

Nice...

 

I agree with all posts. Just a point for future threads, show pic. of reverse too. Please post one.

 

Thanks all!! I guess it is true what they say about blind hogs finding an acorn on occasion.

 

Thanks for the tip!

 

Very nice pics. Don't lose the method. Nice '58.'

 

Thanks Robert. I wasn't sure if it was a 48 or 58. Looked like a four before enlarging.

 

Cool pic.

 

Whaddaya mean "blind hogs"? A hog will eat anything! So, it doesn't matter if it is blind or not. Try squirrels!

 

That's a 48'.

 

Nope, 58. Check lower section for angled lower portion of 5 and upper for top section of 5.

 

Actually it could be both.

Lamination errors can also develop after they were shipped out of the Mint. So it very well could be a post-Mint genuine error.

 

Both a 48 and a 58?

 

It looks more like a 38 to me .

 

Could it be possible to date it via die markers on the reverse if it happened to have a noted ddr? No time to study it at present but at first glance it seems somewhat similar to 48 ddr 003. Forgive me if the question makes no sense. Curious but very new at all this.

 

?

 

Same here, I guess I was confused by your it could be both statement.