Its a crime I tell you....

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by mrbrklyn, Oct 16, 2008.

  1. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    There has to be some statute in the law that this is a violation of.

    Ruben
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. SteveMS70

    SteveMS70 New Member

    Well, do you know the history behnd the 1913 Liberty Head?
     
  4. Just Carl

    Just Carl Numismatist

    I don't understand the problem here. I have an entire roll of those.:p
    Aren't those really common:D
    I really don't understand. There are so many coins out there with limited amounts made or left in existance so what's one more?
     
  5. Julien

    Julien Member

    Actually the five 1913 Liberty nickels are technically illegal and not a coins since they were produced without mint sanction and is in reality stolen government property. Also your picture appears to be the "Smithsonian Specimen".

    EDIT: A great book about the 1913 Liberty nickels is "Million Dollar Nickels - Mysteries of the Illicit 1913 Liberty Nickels Revealed".
     
  6. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    I read some of the history but that is no excuse for the harsh clean. It's not a brass door knob and there won't be anything left of that coin if they keep it up. Could they brillo pad the Mona Lisa? It is a public trust. I doubt King Faruok did that.

    Ruben
     
  7. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    Actually, Farouk was famous (as I remember) for cleaning his coins.
     
  8. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    "regarding the 1933 double eagle: "Multitudinous questions about the condition of the coin were put to rest prior to the sale when four experts from the Professional Coin Grading Service (PCGS) viewed the piece and unanimously declared it to be MS65. Because the coin is pedigreed to King Farouk and the monarch was notorious for abrasively cleaning and/or lacquering coins, there was concern that the 1933 $20 had suffered a similar fate. Fortunately that was not the case and the coin was found to be in Gem-quality condition."

    link to follow



    http://www.pcgs.com/articles/article3509.chtml

    [article on the 1933 Double eagle.]
     
  9. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    I dunno about Farouk, Ruben... he was known for polishing his coins to keep them "nice and shiny"
     
  10. jaceravone

    jaceravone Member

  11. Ardatirion

    Ardatirion Où est mon poisson

    The Smithsonian has been known in the past for polishing its coins and has been criticized for it. I don't know if they still do or not.
     
  12. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    Well that is gross negligences by a government agency. Ther must be some protection the public has.

    Ruben
     
  13. Drusus

    Drusus Pecunia non olet

    I think it was probably Forouk who did it, as said before, it is common knowledge that he did such things. I have a feeling the museum did not clean it that harshly. Not only are other coins from his collection in similar condition but he also carried very valuable rare coins in his pockets. These are the least of his crimes.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page