Not my area, but I'll say Yes to the bean. This nickel is gorgeous. On a related note, this coin appears to be weakly-struck. I don't know if that is universal for the 1913-D issue or not but for the sake of this question, let's say that there are sharp, average, and weak strikes among the population of 1913-D nickels. So, for this population of varied strikes, does CAC then consider the strike quality into its determination? In other words, a weakly-struck example in MS-66 would not get the bean while a sharply-struck example in MS-66 would get beaned?
Yes, if people are convinced of the superiority of PCGS most correctly graded coins in NGC holders will get cracked out leaving the mistakes. This makes the "bias" even more lopsided. This was the same problem ANACS or ICG had in the 90s. They could correctly grade most of the time but if you can't get PCGS money for the coin it's gonna get cracked out. As to the comment above about inconsistency: I believe CAC is more so than any of the TPGs by nature. The TPGs have already done the "hard work" by grading the coin in the first place. All CAC does is "bless it" so to speak. IMO, getting the coin from raw to graded is the difficult step (is it fake? Has it been altered? AT? etc etc) has already been done so CAC has the easier task and, IMO, is pretty consistent with it. jom
I like that coin! I compared it to an MS66 plus I have and believe it is accurately graded. Worthy of a greenie.
THat's actually a pretty good strike for the coin. Green Bean....of course I assume than the slab photo is pre-submission. The coin does look close to a 67. jom
Summary Rd. 1: 1921 MS 65 Green CAC Morgan--> Yes: 4 vs No: 3 Rd. 2: 1835 AU 50 Green CAC 50c--> Yes: 2 vs No: 8 Rd. 3: 1939-S Oregon MS 65 Gold CAC 50c--> Yes: 10 (8 Green and 2 Gold) vs No: 0 Rd. 4: 1838 AU 58 Green CAC (Gold $5)--> Yes: 1 vs No: 5 Rd. 5: 1908 MS 63 Green CAC (Gold $20)—> Yes: 5 vs No: 1 Rd. 6: 1885-CC MS 63 PL Green CAC Morgan--> Yes: 8 vs No: 1 Rd. 7: 1946-S MS 66 Green CAC Walker 50c--> Yes: 7 (6 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 1 Rd. 8: 1885-S MS 62 NOT CAC Morgan--> Yes: 5 (4 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 1 Rd. 9: 1830 EF 45 UNKNOWN CAC 50c--> Yes: 10 vs No: 1 Rd. 10*: 1899 MS 65 BN UNKNOWN CAC 1c--> Yes: 4 vs No: 5 Rd. 11: 1942 MS 65 Gold CAC 50c--> Yes: 4 (4 Green and 0 Gold) vs No: 2 Rd. 12: 1940-D MS 67 Star UNKNOWN CAC 10c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 4 Rd. 13*: 1884-O MS 61 Gold CAC $1--> Yes: 9 (4 Green and 5 Gold) vs No: 0 Rd. 14: 1827 AU 55 CAC 10c--> Yes: 1 vs No: 7 Rd. 15: 1851 MS 66 CAC 1c--> Yes: 5 vs No: 4 Rd. 16: 1919-S MS 65 Green CAC 10c--> Yes: 12 (11 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 0 Rd. 17: 1922 MS 65 NOT CAC Peace $1--> Yes: 10 vs No: 1 Rd. 18: 1851 Au 58+ CAC 1/2C--> Yes: 0 vs No: 6 Rd. 19: 1839-O AU 53 NO CAC 50c--> Yes: 6 (5 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 3 Rd. 20: 1920 MS 65 NO CAC 25c--> Yes: 4 vs No: 6 Rd. 21: 1862 PF 64 CAC H10c--> Yes: 5 vs No: 1 Rd. 22: 1869 PF 63 Gold CAC 10c--> Yes: 7 (5 Green and 2 Gold) vs No: 0 Rd. 23: 1834 XF 45 CAC $5--> Yes: 2 vs No: 5 Rd. 24: 1835 XF 40 CAC 25c--> Yes: 8 (7 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 2 Rd. 25: 1876 MS 62 Not CAC 50c--> Yes: 7 (6 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 1 Rd. 26: 1853 MS 64 Not CAC 10c--> Yes: 7 vs No: 0 Rd. 27: 1913 MS 62 CAC 2.5 Gold--> Yes: 1 vs No: 5 Rd. 28: 1835 AU 58 CAC 10c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 7 Rd. 29: 1908-S MS 64 CAC 1c--> Yes: 9 vs No: 2 Rd. 30: 1913-D MS 66+ CAC 5c--> Yes: 10 vs No: 0 Green CAC on coin and deserves it: 10 Green CAC on coin and doesn't deserve it: 7 Gold CAC on coin and deserves it: 1 Gold CAC on coin but should only be Green: 3 Gold CAC on coin but should not sticker: Failed to sticker but deserves a sticker: 5 Failed to sticker and should not sticker: 1 Unknown sticker status and deserves a sticker:1 Unknown sticker status and does not deserve a sticker:2 Note: if we don’t know the status of a coin before the reveal and more people say green CAC for a gold CAC coin, then it will go in the area of “Gold CAC on coin but should only be Green” ....see round 3 as the example case * Rd. 10 was 4-4...I interpreted that CircCam would consider it a no (based on a similar example), which swayed the overall vote to a lean towards no. Rd. 13 was tied between green and gold at 4-4...I interpreted that geekpryde would consider it a gold