Please help me educate another coin page

And why not have some pictures of the ‘38, ‘39, and ‘40 proofs. The reverse of ‘38, of course, was a different style of steps, so they are not full steps as the later reverses would be graded. But that’s as it is, and that still doesn’t have any relevance to the Proof issues.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Wow that's excellent Mr Sanderson. I can use all the info I can get. It's not easy changing these peoples mind, much like I used to be, I'm sure. Lol
Thank you
Foo

 

To say a full step proof would be redundant.

More likely to say: 'non-full step'. But that would be unusual

 

Please correct me if I am wrong, but full steps also means all three sets of stairs are visible and are NOT broken. When I say broken, all steps are intact without any breaks or scratches!

 

Please refer to @Lehigh96 ’s tutorial on this subject :
The FS (Full Step) Designation for Jefferson Nickels Defined (PHOTOGRAPHICALLY)