So would this be considered a mint error?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by qazwsxedc, Mar 18, 2005.

  1. qazwsxedc

    qazwsxedc Junior Member

    I found that the penny sealed in my 1993 San Francisco proof set is damaged. It has this dent in the open area on the left.

    Here’s a picture of it. Sorry about it being so big.

    http://k.1asphost.com/qazwsxedc647/Picture.jpg

    so considering that its sealed in a proof set would that mean this happened at the mint?
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Speedy

    Speedy Researching Coins Supporter

    Well..I'm no expert but I would call that damaged--it is easy for somrhing like that to happen at the mint...that is what I think.
    Speedy
     
  4. Bluesmanmoney

    Bluesmanmoney New Member

    I would think it is a mint error since it is a proof and had to go thru QA process. Not an error expert but it is interesting.
     
  5. collect4fun

    collect4fun Senior Member

    IMO if it happened at the mint, it is a mint error, isn't that what an error is, damage or otherwise?
     
  6. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    A error occurs during the strike - damage occurs after the strike whether it happens at the mint or not.
     
  7. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    In the image it doesn't appear to be a dent, it looks like a bubble in the plating.
     
  8. qazwsxedc

    qazwsxedc Junior Member

    I guess the picture does make it look different but it a dent.

    Any way then is it common for damaged coins to be found in proof sets?
     
  9. Bluesmanmoney

    Bluesmanmoney New Member

    They shouldn't be, they are supposed :p to be the finest of the finest. They are supposed to be flawless, they are stuck multiple times and the dies are specialy polished.
     
  10. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator


    Common no, but it does happen.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page