At work today I found a 2003 and a 2006 star note both in really good condition. Still crisp no folds or tears. What would you guess the worth? I know not much but just wondering. Here are the serial numbers if that means anything. L05887768 f16360557
I have YET to find any 2006 stars!!! as for value on the 2006, they are still current, so face value. the 2003 note is worth a couple/few bucks at most.
I am in training for replacement of our current head teller at the bank when she possibly quits at the first of the year (I hope that she doesn't though cuz I love her) so I have the honor of going through hundreds of bills to weed out the bad ones a couple of days a week. These are the only 2 stars that I found today and I searched ALOT.
Awsome job lol to get PAID to weed through thousands of dollars looking for the 'bad' ones dont forget, if you ever find yourself with too many stars, think of your old pal daggarjon
Can anyone help me!!!!!!??????? I have found 100 consective $1 star notes.... Is this worth any thing
100 consective $1 star notes help I found a bundle of $1 star notes at work today so I bought the bundle. they are all consective and in exclent condition
value depends on condition, series, serials... ect you cant say they are only worth $101 without ever looking at them.
Exactly. We need more information. If you could provide a photo of the notes that would be a start. All I can tell you is they are worth at least $100 with the current information.
Depends on condition and FRB in this case I assume it's a new pack, generally you can expect to get between $150-$185 retail (eBay)
I'm a bit confused: neither of those could be 2003 series $1s. The F could be 2003A though. And the L has to be 2006. If so, the 03A L* is a full 3.2M run, but the 06 F* is a short 384,000 run, but one of six runs, three of which were full runs. The F* might be worth a premium to a print run collector, especially given that it's quite near the end of the range (up to 163 84000). That F* should be plate position G4, if my math is correct. John