Let's see some "STRUCK THRU GREASE" coins

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by dwhiz, Jan 1, 2013.


  1. Greasy strikes became absolutely pandemic on Kennedy halves during the 1990s. The Mint didn't seem to care until they started selling them as NIFC.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Islander80-83

    Islander80-83 Well-Known Member

    Well, I think it is....

    S20181119_001-ccfopt.jpg
    S20181119_002-ccfopt.jpg
    S20181119_003-ccfopt.jpg
    S20181119_004-ccfopt.jpg
    S20181119_005-ccfopt.jpg
     
  4. Islander80-83 likes this.
  5. Islander80-83

    Islander80-83 Well-Known Member

    A cud? Really? Okay, thanks for that! icon_smile_thumbsup.gif
     
  6. Islander80-83

    Islander80-83 Well-Known Member

  7. Hunter_123

    Hunter_123 Active Member

    ?
     

    Attached Files:

  8. Islander80-83 likes this.
  9. Islander80-83

    Islander80-83 Well-Known Member

    icon_smile_headscratch.gif Maybe it is.
     
  10. Beardigger

    Beardigger Well-Known Member

    been saving greasers for awhile. This is one of my favorites
    image.jpg image.jpg image.jpg .
     
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2020
  11. Islander80-83

    Islander80-83 Well-Known Member

    You seem to be conflicted!
     
  12. masterswimmer

    masterswimmer A Caretaker, can't take it with me

    I found this in the wild in 1973 or 1974 so I know it's no later than that. I have no provenance to prove that claim but I'm quite sure that won't affect 'value' in any way.

    20190807_001535.jpg
     
    alurid likes this.
  13. Not at all. The two photos seem to indicate two different errors, at least to my admittedly myopic eyesight.

    The 1990 cent appears to be a slight cavitation, likely caused by failure of the copper to properly adhere to the zinc, whereas the error in the earlier photo looked more convex to me.

    As always, I could be wrong.
     
  14. Nice one!
     
  15. Islander80-83

    Islander80-83 Well-Known Member

    You first said it was a cud then you said it was lamination.

    It's one error on one coin, two different angles. It's not convex, the area in question is concave. You got the 1990 part right though.
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2020
  16. Islander80-83

    Islander80-83 Well-Known Member

  17. Me-ow!
     
    Justinn likes this.
  18. Islander80-83

    Islander80-83 Well-Known Member

    Now there's an intelligent response! You should talk to this guy, you speak the same language! :hilarious:

    Screen Shot 2020-01-23 at 4.48.17 PM.png
     
  19. I was indicating that your last response came across as quite catty.

    I admitted that I was incorrect with my first diagnosis. I apologize. What more do you want?
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2020
  20. Islander80-83

    Islander80-83 Well-Known Member

    I thought you were being sarcastic by using "Me-ow!" whatever that meant. If I misunderstood you, I'm sorry.
     
  21. I was, because I thought your previous response was sarcastic. I also apologize.
     
    Islander80-83 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page