1880 Morgan $1-GTG

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Paddy54, Dec 2, 2019.

  1. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    Heres another show find....one of my favorite holders too! 20191202_131054.jpg 20191202_131111.jpg
     
    longshot and Ana Silverbell like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Ana Silverbell

    Ana Silverbell Well-Known Member

    I hate grading from photographs but I will say AU-55 (if I am seeing wear on the eagles chest and it's not the angle of view).

    The International Numismatic Grading Service holders is my favorite holder outside PCGS and NGC. I have an 1899-0 Morgan with a VSS (varslab.com) sticker on the reverse of the slab indicating a VAM-39 attribution. With International Numismatic Grading Service holders I have to be careful not to buy the holder instead of the coin!

    I have found that International Numismatic Grading Service's grades are pretty accurate.
     
    Paddy54 likes this.
  4. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    7bf3a9dd-fb60-4f35-934d-e8dc8630cca7_fullsize.jpg b011c72c-89a7-4266-a31f-6e79b1b2512a_fullsize.jpg
     
  5. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    20180411_051906.jpg 20180423_194545.jpg

    Yeah I have a weakness for these older slabs.
     
  6. Islander80-83

    Islander80-83 Well-Known Member

    Yes, I like those older holders as well. AU-50
     
  7. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    Dunno. Au-58?
     
  8. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

  9. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    Based on the photos, I thinking either AU 55 or AU 58...
    first thought was 58, so I'll stick with it.
     
  10. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

  11. TheFinn

    TheFinn Well-Known Member

    I don't know what they graded it, but I would grade it AU55.
     
  12. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

  13. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat Well-Known Member

  14. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    This more a lesson on the eveloution of grading.... I am in the high Au. group as the wear is so lite and the luster is there...even cart wheel luster in hand. I've never pass on these slabs as I find by today's standards I'm up a grade on each purchase ,plus I love these slabs, as well old pci photo slabs. The 1897 above at ms 65 is better in hand than a 65. So once again my point proved don't over look these slabs! 20191201_201907.jpg
    I paid $35 in Au 58 it's a 48/$50 coin.
    True not a huge price difference between the 2 grades however still a win in all my purchases of such slabs.
    The 1897 I paid $139. In 65 it's a $265. Coin in 66 $ 750.
     
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2019
    Islander80-83 and Ana Silverbell like this.
  15. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    Looks low AU to me. A lot of the luster is gone. Probably enough left to make AU-53
     
    Lembeck13 likes this.
  16. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Well-Known Member

  17. Ana Silverbell

    Ana Silverbell Well-Known Member

    Clearly under-graded, which seems to be the case with International Numismatic Grading Service, at least by today's standards. I mentioned above that I have an 1899-0 Morgan in an INGS slab. It is graded MS64 but it would easily grade MS65 today. I have no intention of breaking it out: I like these holders, and to me it is not worth the approximate $50 price difference at MS65.
     
    Paddy54 likes this.
  18. buckeye73

    buckeye73 Well-Known Member

  19. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    And that's not so......there's plenty under the grey tone if I could dip this coin 1 time.....you could use it as a signal mirror. Between the Samsung crap camera and the haze on this coin it looks washed out..... this coin was purchase not to flip it was purchased for two reasons 1 the slab, and 2 the coin it's self, having a xf40 grade when actually it's an Au58/62 now would I grade it MS? No I wouldn't but it's a great teaching tool, and a cool slab at 35 bucks it's a win /win.
     
  20. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    Yes I agree Ana as by today's standards I do believe that this coin on a good day could of recieved a low MS or an Au. 58.
    Again I buy these because I like them as well as a few other older slabs. I wish I ould find other denominations in these slabs.....they do appear even seen a sample slab....but not often and mostly house Morgans or Peace dollars..
    I do not intend to break it out..... while it in my collection it shall have sanctuary u til my passing.
    I broke out an 1834 bust quarter out of a soap bar slab years ago.....and have regrets to this day.
    I see these, as well items as Such in this hobby as pieces history.... if we bust them out you have destroyed a part of history......well others may think different ...spend 30,40 ,....50 plus years in this hobby .....and you to may learn to apperciate leaving them for others to enjoy.
     
  21. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    So now I need to ask @Conder101 @Burton Strauss III about this slab.
    This one has on the reverse of the slab REGISTERED 8216408.
    The other specimens I own have a number on the front of the slab.any help is appreciated .
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page