Anyone see why this didn't grade?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by ddddd, Oct 8, 2019.

Page 3 of 3
  1. Islander80-83

    Islander80-83 Well-Known Member

    Probably because it's ICG. Not one of the top 3.
     
    Islander80-83, Nov 22, 2019
    #41 + Quote Reply
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    ICG and Anacs are generally considered on par or close at #3 and #4 (after PCGS & NGC). Insider makes a solid point in the thread I originally linked as to why these should be graded. I could see Anacs doing the same. The top two are less likely to do so (unless there was enough demand for it).
     
    ddddd, Nov 22, 2019
    #42 + Quote Reply
  4. Islander80-83

    Islander80-83 Well-Known Member

    Oh, okay. Yes, I see the point.
     
    Islander80-83, Nov 22, 2019
    #43 + Quote Reply
    ddddd likes this.
  5. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Michael's Deli here in my hometown (Brunswick, Georgia) has a Shrimp Po' Boy that is pure awesomeness on a bun.

    This one ain't theirs (in fact, it's not nearly as good looking), but theirs is similar. (Not unlike the one pictured on that Wikipedia page.)

    They don't even use our famous Wild Georgia shrimp, but it sure is good.

    But we digress. Continue numismatic topic, as you were.

    [​IMG]
     
    lordmarcovan, Nov 23, 2019
    #44 + Quote Reply
    Sunflower_Coins, ddddd and Islander80-83 like this.
  6. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    The reed count cannot help on this coin. If the Mint cannot be determined this works fine for ICG: 1889-( ). Same as off center coins...19( )-D.
     
    Insider, Nov 25, 2019
    #45 + Quote Reply
    ddddd likes this.
Page 3 of 3
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page