Vitellius Sestertius - Genuine or not?

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Julius Germanicus, Oct 16, 2019.

?

Are all of these cast forgeries?

  1. 1) Yes

    8 vote(s)
    66.7%
  2. 2) Nr. 5 looks genuine

    1 vote(s)
    8.3%
  3. 3) Nr. 6 looks genuine

    1 vote(s)
    8.3%
  4. 4) Nr. 5 and Nr.6 look genuine

    2 vote(s)
    16.7%
  1. Julius Germanicus

    Julius Germanicus Well-Known Member

    Here are six large bronzes of Vitellius, RIC 141, obviously from the same pair of dies (or casting form) - note the unusual GERMA-N and the obverse legend error omitting the (TR) P due to missing space.

    1) sold on VCOINS as a Paduan (23,71 mm, 34 mm):

    2sjZzZE5W8iJKa3jm6wS9rG8K4mLge-1.jpg
    2) Bertolami Fine Arts, sold as Paduan (35 mm, 25,23g, 6 h):
    image01579.jpg

    3) a Paduan, posted by CT member Carthago: Bildschirmfoto 2019-10-16 um 15.18.07.png

    4) Uppsala Coin Cabinett (19,89 gr / 35,55 mm / 7,5h) "most probably a later forgery": Bildschirmfoto 2019-10-16 um 15.12.24.png

    5) Harvard Art Museum, supposed to be genuine (22,74 gr, 7 h): Bildschirmfoto 2019-10-16 um 15.25.26.png

    6) Gorny & Mosch, sold as genuine (22,22 gr):
    image03583.jpg

    I think all of these (including the last two) must be cast forgeries from the same source despite the different weight (and flan shape) due to the identical wear pattern (the presumably genuine specimen in the British Museum is from a different pair of dies).

    Any suggestions? I still need one of these...
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    Suggestion: Decide if the story behind the coin offsets the matter of the coin you 'need' probably being post-ancient. It would be a great coin to own for the educational value and I could see buying one sold and priced as what it was (not ancient) as being quite attractive. While there is question on the matter, let someone else pay full price for the doubt.
     
    Julius Germanicus likes this.
  4. Ken Dorney

    Ken Dorney Yea, I'm Cool That Way...

    You would have to do a little more research on these to find out how old some might be. I dont know if they are as old as the contemporary 16th Century examples, but could be after casts up to this century I suppose. Provenance would help you to tell how old each might be.
     
    Julius Germanicus likes this.
  5. Lolli

    Lolli Active Member

    Here is another one from same obverse die, but with a different reverse die .It seems like they all have the same die shift on obverse that caused some doubling on the lower part of the bust, the ribbons of laureate and the letters.

    https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=3511422
     
    Julius Germanicus likes this.
  6. Julius Germanicus

    Julius Germanicus Well-Known Member

    Update:

    I was (luckily) outbid, but someone paid 800 Euros (plus commission etc) for OP coin Nr.6 yesterday.
    It cannot have served as the host coin for the others as it has less detail than some. Doesn´t it look like the chin seems to have been "smoothed" away to make the portrait look more realistic? :inpain:
     
  7. Ken Dorney

    Ken Dorney Yea, I'm Cool That Way...

    I noticed the price and was really surprised. The buyer will be disappointed at some point when they try to sell. I also watched the Heritage auction live last night. I was shocked at the prices people were paying. Some people think the ancients hobby is dying, but I just dont see it.
     
    Julius Germanicus and red_spork like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page