What would you grade this walker?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by AdamL, May 5, 2008.

  1. AdamL

    AdamL Well-Known Member

    obverse:
    [​IMG]

    reverse:
    [​IMG]


    Thanks.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Bonedigger

    Bonedigger New Member

    That's a PURTY coin... AU-58???

    Ben
     
  4. walterallen

    walterallen Coin Collector

    MS-62. Very nice coin...me like.

    Allen
     
  5. Spider

    Spider ~

    nice coin

    the luster will hold it under 64 though

    I would give it 62 on a bad day and 63 on a good one
     
  6. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    I agree with Ben: AU-58.


    But it may dip out unc.
     
  7. kanga

    kanga 65 Year Collector

    Dull surfaces; no apparent hourglass effect.
    I'm thinking AU-55 to AU-58.

    Good strike, but not full.
    Gown lines across the leg are just short of complete.
    Left hand has almost no detail.
    But these are strike problems, not wear.
     
  8. Mark Feld

    Mark Feld Rare coin dealer

    I'd guess MS63.
     
  9. Tater

    Tater Coin Collector

    I'd give it a MS-63
     
  10. WmsJewelers

    WmsJewelers New Member

    Coins don't dip out Unc. They are Unc due to lack of wear. Lack of luster will hold the coin from a high MS grade but will never take a coin under MS 60.

    I think the coin looks like a solid Ms 63 maybe a 64. Can't really make out the eagles breast that well. It also appears to have a light tone that would be masking some luster. Really need better pictures to tell though.
     
  11. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    I'm not a walker guy, but my first reaction was 63.
     
  12. AdamL

    AdamL Well-Known Member

    WMSJewelers, you have a point. The lighting wasn't the best, which almost completely masks the luster on this coin. My coin photography skills are lacking. I only have access to a good camera when my brother is in town, which he is now. I'll try to get a better picture sometime this week.
     
  13. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    :whistle:ms-63- rzage After seeing the new picture , I'd say it looks as nice as one I have slabbed by PCGS as MS-64
     
  14. ryanbrooks

    ryanbrooks Active Member

    I'm gonna go with an AU-58 :)
     
  15. AdamL

    AdamL Well-Known Member

    I forgot, I have some more pictures, I just gadn't uploaded them yet. The two that I chose to post above are the ones that best show the detail on the coin. The following picture is blurry, but it is the closest I got to showing the color/luster of the coin:
    [​IMG]
    Thanks again for the opinions guys.
     
  16. ikes4ever

    ikes4ever Senior Member

    MS-62
    i am in a good mood tonight
     
  17. Shortgapbob

    Shortgapbob Emerging Numismatist

    Tough to tell how the luster looks with the lighting, so I will cop out and call it UNCish.
     
  18. AdamL

    AdamL Well-Known Member

    LOL. Good call Shortgapbob.
     
  19. asciibaron

    asciibaron /dev/work/null

    MS60 - it's a good strike - the hand is very clean as are the breast feathers (of the eagle!!)

    -Steve
     
  20. vipergts2

    vipergts2 Jester in hobby of kings

    I'd have to say AU58, good clean coin but appears to have a couple slight rubs on the reverse. If they aren't rubs I would say 64. Just hard to tell unless it's in hand.
     
  21. sf340flier

    sf340flier New Member

    I don't see any wear. Based on the first set of pics, I say a 63. Your second pic of the reverse shows luster that coul make this a possible 64.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page