Error(s) or just damage?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Chip Kirkpatrick, Aug 20, 2019.

  1. Chip Kirkpatrick

    Chip Kirkpatrick Well-Known Member

    EB87BA30-23BB-4D8D-9956-82B2AA321642.jpeg 92659FC0-9D78-4BC8-B072-0C50FE4DB84B.jpeg E8076EFF-290E-4940-AAC2-F503744C77BB.jpeg 31CB8F53-B1F5-4AA9-9712-41E5FB4C769F.jpeg EB87BA30-23BB-4D8D-9956-82B2AA321642.jpeg 92659FC0-9D78-4BC8-B072-0C50FE4DB84B.jpeg E8076EFF-290E-4940-AAC2-F503744C77BB.jpeg 31CB8F53-B1F5-4AA9-9712-41E5FB4C769F.jpeg 3B9417EF-6EF4-43D4-80C6-19A7D99E40A8.jpeg C05C66AC-5C5B-48FC-A5E1-FFBBA18987DA.jpeg 58720340-9CF3-4521-BC43-5CD8DF52E2DE.jpeg 79FD25D4-C323-481F-AB8A-7BDA27D8F3EF.jpeg 570AC986-9DAA-4A4B-8931-A1F64C8ACBE5.jpeg Looking at this ‘78 quarter I am curious about the mintmark and the “M” in UNUM. The M’s right “leg” appears to be multilayered. One of the photos of the M is upside down to give a different view.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Legomaster1

    Legomaster1 Cointalk Patron

    Just looks like a well worn quarter to me...
    Wait for what others have to say.
     
  4. JCro57

    JCro57 Making Errors Great Again

    Worth 25 cents
     
  5. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Circulation wear and tear. Spend it.
     
  6. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Die Chip in Mint Mark

    The rest is circulation wear

    Nice shot of that fingerprint.
    Capture+_2019-08-21-07-20-13.png
     
  7. Burton Strauss III

    Burton Strauss III Brother can you spare a trime? Supporter

    If you are going to use a microscope, learn how to take images directly from the microscope.

    Taking a PICTURE of the screen is useless - you have double sampling (digitizing) of the image and that creates artifacts.

    Either of your full-sized pictures of the obverse is good enough - it shows the whole coin and the context of what you are asking about. Next time shoot them where the coin is SQUARE to the camera, not at an angle... the imaging system will have only a small part of the coin truly in focus and the rest blurry.

    That plus one of the closeups (next time in focus, please) is enough to identify the obverse item as a "die chip" or broken post (remember: The die is inverted, so the hole in the D in the minted coin is a small post on the die - they break off, causing the filled letter).


    The images of the reverse aren't as good, but you can clearly see a ridge on the M and that makes it damage not a mint error (something hit the coin with enough force to move the metal).
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page