It’s just an opinion. I don’t mind that you disagree. It doesn’t make you wrong. Once we recognize there’s no right or wrong with opinions, we can accept that this grade is also neither right or wrong, it’s simply a subjective assessment of the luster. That’s why I struggle with coins over 65; it’s all subjective.
Maybe the fine folks at PCGS were afraid they'd get another return for an overgraded mistake for which they would have to pay out big money! Do I hear anything from the...... Chris
If lack of luster is a criterion for knocking a very clean coin down a notch or two explain why toning isn't treated as a negative as well.
I don't mind we disagree as well. This grading and toning thing we talk about with all these coins is fortunately or unfortunately always subjective.
You never know what someone will try when they have paid $300K for a coin. Just ask his lawyer! Chris
Toning doesn't interest me in the least. Makes bad coins look better. Going to glue my mamas 38 proof set to my satilite disk next summer. Sorry @Lehigh96
Just goes to show that toning carries alot of weight. PCGS missed this one. I can tell. And i was born yesterday. It just goes to show that you members are very good at grading. You can't fool the pros. You members are great. Typecoins. You are making the right choice not sending it in. Cuz the members we trust nailed it.
The coin in the OP looks like a solid 67 FB, however if the luster is broken on Liberty's cheek I can understand the grade of 65