Dual struck clad layer - 40% silver Kennedy

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by JCro57, Aug 5, 2019.

  1. JCro57

    JCro57 Making Errors Great Again

    1.9 grams. A real beauty. I'm guessing it was conserved by NGC. Did a great job if they did.

    1968-69 D 50c dual struck clad  layer obv.JPG 1968-69 D 50c dual struck clad  layer rev.JPG
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Islander80-83

    Islander80-83 Well-Known Member

    Can we see the entire slab?
     
  4. JCro57

    JCro57 Making Errors Great Again

    Unfortunately i dont post labels anymore
     
  5. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    Could you just tell us what the slab says?
     
    Islander80-83 and Seattlite86 like this.
  6. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    This is both sides with the inner core missing?
     
  7. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    What makes you think that this will stop *i2i* from using your photo?

    Chris
     
    paddyman98 and JCro57 like this.
  8. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    +1, what's the verbiage please
     
    Islander80-83 likes this.
  9. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    .
     
    Last edited: Aug 5, 2019
  10. Islander80-83

    Islander80-83 Well-Known Member

    Can I ask why? The certification number is on the rev. we don't need to see that.
     
  11. JCro57

    JCro57 Making Errors Great Again

  12. JCro57

    JCro57 Making Errors Great Again

    One of the 2 layers.
     
    Seattlite86 likes this.
  13. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    And it was struck after the layer separated from the rest of the coin.

    Not sure what you mean by "dual struck".
     
  14. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Surely either the obverse or reverse design would be a lot less clear if that had happened, right?

    I figured the unique presence of both obverse and reverse features on both sides arose because this is a really thin fragment, struck as a fragment, with both dies contacting its metal.
     
  15. JCro57

    JCro57 Making Errors Great Again

    Meant to say both sides were struck, albeit weakly
     
  16. Fred Weinberg

    Fred Weinberg Well-Known Member

    Nice coin Joe - and much much rarer than
    a planchet itself missing one of the outer layers.
     
    JCro57 and paddyman98 like this.
  17. John Burgess

    John Burgess Well-Known Member

    I think it's more of a progressive indirect die transfer due to it being so thin and not that it was struck twice. If it was double struck they would put that on the label also.
     
  18. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Copyright. I don't blame him these days.
     
  19. Islander80-83

    Islander80-83 Well-Known Member

    Copyright. Hmmm icon_smile_headscratch.gif And who's going to enforce that, the copyright police?
     
  20. JCro57

    JCro57 Making Errors Great Again

    I do it to keep what i paid for it private. Not hard to look when so few exist
     
  21. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    He is, by only letting out pieces of it. He’s controlling that himself.
     
    JCro57 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page