Picked up a Starr IV Owl (475-465 BC)

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Nathan P, Aug 2, 2019.

  1. Nathan P

    Nathan P Well-Known Member

    I also took this picture, which is by far the best I've done photo-wise.

    imgonline-com-ua-twotoone-VwCSeKXIBCf.jpg
    AR Tetradrachm

    24 mm, 17.19 g

    Chester Starr arranged Athens' coinage from ca. 480 until the mid 5th century into five groups, and his chronology is still widely accepted today (although the dating of the final groups is now considered too late). The style of the "transitional" Athenian tetradrachms from the late 470s through the early 450s B.C. – Starr's groups II through V – is considered the high mark of Athenian coinage. By the time of Starr's Group IV, production of tetradrachms had steadily increased and the uptick in the number of required dies (and engravers) necessitated a greater standardization of style. On the obverse, the head of Athena changes little from Starr's Group III – the goddess has a bold profile and retains her "archaic smile"; the hair on her forehead is arranged in two waves, with a small bend above the eye; and on her helmet, her leaves float above the visor (sometimes referred to as a "laurel wreath," these leaves were first introduced after the victory over the Persians in 480/79 BC). One difference from Group III is the helmet's palmette, which goes from pointing to the adjacent olive leaf to more parallel. On the reverse, the back leg of the Group IV's owl often stretches further back and the tail feather no longer touches the rear claw.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Mat

    Mat Ancient Coincoholic

    Even with the test mark, it's still a wonderful looking coin.
     
    Eric Kondratieff and Nathan P like this.
  4. Orfew

    Orfew Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus

    I would be proud to own that coin. It has many positive things going for it.
     
    Nathan P likes this.
  5. Nathan P

    Nathan P Well-Known Member

    Thanks! Yeah, the test cut brought it into the realm of affordability for me. I'd rather have a coin with sharper features and a minor test cut than a softer, though pristine coin.
     
  6. PeteB

    PeteB Well-Known Member

    Splendid photo!!! I feel I could reach out and touch it!
     
    Eric Kondratieff, Nathan P and TIF like this.
  7. randygeki

    randygeki Coin Collector

    Wonderful coin!
     
    Nathan P likes this.
  8. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    Great coin! Great photo!
    +1 Exactly!
     
    Nathan P likes this.
  9. lrbguy

    lrbguy Well-Known Member

    Good job on the picture!

    I have been trying to see the differences between this type and those from the next group. You pic will finally give me a good look at the details. Thanks, from one who is NOT a specialist in these.
     
    Nathan P likes this.
  10. Nathan P

    Nathan P Well-Known Member

    I didn't know anything about these coins until recently (Cointalk members really helped me out here). The main difference between Starr IV and Starr V is the top wave of Athena's hair. On Starr IV it has that indentation above the eye. On Starr V there is no indentation and the hair goes across the forehead in parallel curves. The big difference between all the transitional coinage identified by Starr and the subsequent mass coinage issued after 454 (or 449) BC is the owl's tail feather on the reverse. The Starr transitional coinage owls all have three prongs on their bottom tail feather while the later mass coinage owls all have only a single prong.
     
    Orfew likes this.
  11. zumbly

    zumbly Ha'ina 'ia mai ana ka puana

    What everyone else said. Excellent coin and picture! Congrats on the superb acquisition.
     
    Nathan P likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page