Ok, I’m ready. It’s time for the COIN TALK Choir to don their robes and sing in 3 part harmony “ITS POST MINT DAMAGE!” ( to the tune of Onward Christian Soldiers). It’s ok. I know it is too. But there’s just something about this coin that speaks to me.
I may be wrong, but there are two things that suggest to me that it is not PMD. 1) I see no evidence of coin metal pushed up and out along the edge of the depression. 2) Looking at the reverse, I see no evidence of any damage that you would expect to see from the impact if someone had intentionally damaged the obverse. It is possible that it was caused by a strikethrough, but I'll wait to see what others have to say. Chris
You need to add the word JUST for it to go with that tune! "ITS JUST POST MINT DAMAGE!" I agree with @cpm9ball You might have something there.
The lack of damage to the reverse and no ridge around the indent has me agreeing with Struck Though Debris. Nice coin.
Add me to the group that believes it's a strike through for the reasons others posted. No evidence of metal displacement and no visible damage on the reverse. Nice find
My ignorance showing here: I would have immediately said PMD. Another example of why I continue to enjoy CT. Hardly a day goes by without learning at least one thing. BTW, can I sing tenor in the Choir? Steve
Dammit! I post all those wonderful “errors” I find and they all get shot down. Then I find ONE that I’m sure MUST be PMD and it’s not. Story of my life. Lol. Many thanks guys!
In the blue photo you can see that the depression still contains the original dings, dents, and marks from rolling, punching, washing, and tumbling dry the planchet. These would have been obliterated by any post-mint contact severe enough to create this size dent.