COIN TALK Choir

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Chip Kirkpatrick, Jul 26, 2019.

  1. Chip Kirkpatrick

    Chip Kirkpatrick Well-Known Member

    575CCA36-F112-408E-A7E1-A46F5E09CCA2.jpeg C60C1431-C831-4ABD-83C2-B6FC22C92C3A.jpeg A989F2E0-086C-4FCD-8648-C2C98FE4E3BF.jpeg 2E5D34F3-E5BC-425C-BFBD-ED41F85EE015.jpeg Ok, I’m ready.

    It’s time for the COIN TALK Choir to don their robes and sing in 3 part harmony “ITS POST MINT DAMAGE!” ( to the tune of Onward Christian Soldiers).

    It’s ok. I know it is too. But there’s just something about this coin that speaks to me.
     
    Randy Abercrombie likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    I may be wrong, but there are two things that suggest to me that it is not PMD. 1) I see no evidence of coin metal pushed up and out along the edge of the depression. 2) Looking at the reverse, I see no evidence of any damage that you would expect to see from the impact if someone had intentionally damaged the obverse.

    It is possible that it was caused by a strikethrough, but I'll wait to see what others have to say.

    Chris
     
  4. tommyc03

    tommyc03 Senior Member

    I am in agreement with Chris.
     
  5. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    You need to add the word JUST for it to go with that tune!
    "ITS JUST POST MINT DAMAGE!":singing::singing::singing:

    I agree with @cpm9ball
    You might have something there.
     
    I_like_Morgans and SmokinJoe like this.
  6. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I saw a coin like this once before a long time ago and it was not PMD.
     
  7. alurid

    alurid Well-Known Member

    The lack of damage to the reverse and no ridge around the indent has me agreeing with Struck Though Debris.
    Nice coin.
     
  8. Oldhoopster

    Oldhoopster Member of the ANA since 1982

    Add me to the group that believes it's a strike through for the reasons others posted. No evidence of metal displacement and no visible damage on the reverse. Nice find
     
  9. alurid

    alurid Well-Known Member

    I bet that coin would be fun to inspect In Hand.
    Cool looking P mintmark.
     
  10. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    I'm thinking strikethrough as well.
     
  11. Stevearino

    Stevearino Well-Known Member

    My ignorance showing here: I would have immediately said PMD. Another example of why I continue to enjoy CT. Hardly a day goes by without learning at least one thing.

    BTW, can I sing tenor in the Choir?

    Steve
     
  12. Chip Kirkpatrick

    Chip Kirkpatrick Well-Known Member

    Dammit!

    I post all those wonderful “errors” I find and they all get shot down. Then I find ONE that I’m sure MUST be PMD and it’s not.

    Story of my life. Lol.

    Many thanks guys!
     
  13. Stevearino

    Stevearino Well-Known Member

    Now the question is, what could have caused this depression?

    Steve
     
  14. buckeye73

    buckeye73 Well-Known Member

    +1
     
  15. halfcent1793

    halfcent1793 Well-Known Member

    Concur with struck-through.
     
  16. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    You can take my place!

    Chris
     
    Stevearino likes this.
  17. RonSanderson

    RonSanderson Supporter! Supporter

    In the blue photo you can see that the depression still contains the original dings, dents, and marks from rolling, punching, washing, and tumbling dry the planchet. These would have been obliterated by any post-mint contact severe enough to create this size dent.
     
  18. coin roll

    coin roll Active Member

    There is a threaded screw impression at the bottom of the ear lobe. I agree, not PMD. Nice find!
     
  19. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

  20. tommyc03

    tommyc03 Senior Member

    Patience is a virtue my friend.
     
  21. eric6794

    eric6794 Well-Known Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page