Just a thought, and not sure if I'm off base, but the mint marks, at this time, were hand punched into the dies. It's possible that the worker, working the 'punch', was a tad bit off with his weapon......
Type C quarters are hard to find with photos. The pictures have to be pretty spot on. I think the D mintmark may be an RPM with a side of machine doubling. The first mintmark looks south of the second mintmark. There are a couple known RPMs for this date. Check the link at the bottom of the page. It looks like it may be WRPM-007. See if your coin has any of the die markers. If not that one maybe one of the others. http://www.doubleddie.com/1237766.html
Then why is the rest of the coin not RPM'd? I find it hard to believe that only the mint mark could be Rpm'd
I still use my turntable almost every day. Records sound MUCH better than remixed washed out CD's, even if there are scratches.
Repunched Mint Marks was a totally manually process. The technician, during die maintenance would take the die, set it in a vice and pull out a small hardened steel rod which had just the mint mark on it. They would then under magnification slot it in the current mm and hammer the rod to make the mm deeper. Sometimes they were off and you would have multiple shifted images of the MM, ala RPMs. Of course, they may have buffed the die before the MM maintenance too. But RPM, as the name implies, is solely related to the Mint Mark.