19 -- ? Hello, I thank everyone who leaves a comment. What year do you think it is? Thanks in advanc

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Napoleon1, Jul 10, 2019.

Tags:
  1. Napoleon1

    Napoleon1 Member

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Is it a wheatie or a memorial reverse?

    Chris
     
    Inspector43 likes this.
  4. Kasia

    Kasia Got my learning hat on

    Without seeing the reverse to confirm that it is a LMC, I think it is perhaps a 1983.
     
  5. Phil Ham

    Phil Ham Hamster

    I'll guess a 1993 but it would be nice to see the reverse.
     
  6. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    What ever the date, it's 'damaged goods' and as such, not enticing to collect.......
     
  7. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    In that condition the date doesn't matter as it's only worth one cent.
     
  8. Napoleon1

    Napoleon1 Member

    I know it's damaged, but at least it's important for me to know or have opinions about your date
     
  9. Kasia

    Kasia Got my learning hat on

    Now you have opinions. So... Is it a memorial reverse?????
     
  10. Napoleon1

    Napoleon1 Member

    20190629_162221.jpg
     
  11. Kasia

    Kasia Got my learning hat on

    Well, it is no 1983
     
    R_rabbit likes this.
  12. 2x2 $averKrazy

    2x2 $averKrazy Hopelessly coined in

    looks like a 9 on the other. end to me,
     
  13. Napoleon1

    Napoleon1 Member

    the same to me
     
  14. Napoleon1

    Napoleon1 Member

  15. 2x2 $averKrazy

    2x2 $averKrazy Hopelessly coined in

    39 maybe
     
    TIF likes this.
  16. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    I can attribute this one to a narrower date range than that wheatie.

    The ID is made by recognizing the portrait as belonging to Julia Domna and corn ears and long torch as belonging to Ceres.

    [​IMG]
    Julia Domna, AD 193-217.
    Roman Æ as, 13.49 g, 27.6 mm, 5 h.
    Rome, AD 198.
    Obv: IVLIA AVGVSTA, bare-headed and draped bust, right.
    Rev: CERES S C, Ceres standing left, holding corn ears and long torch; altar at feet, left.
    Refs: RIC 870; BMCRE 781; Cohen 19; RCV 6636; Hill 346.

    Here's the example in the British Museum for comparison:

    [​IMG]
     
    frankjg, Randy Abercrombie and NLL like this.
  17. ewomack

    ewomack 魚の下着

    I have an appreciation for beautifully mutilated coinage and this is another nice example. Worn and mutilated coins have completed their economic duties (or perhaps run over by heavy machinery, or both).

    My first impression, before seeing the reverse, was 1959, now I know that's impossible. Looking at pictures of undefiled 1939 cents, the shape of the third number from left doesn't really match all that well. The number may be just too mutilated to compare it to better preserved specimens. Nonetheless, I would have to go with either a "2" or a "3," purely through elimination of "1" and "4." Given that the final number really looks like a "9," that should rule out "5" as well.

    Another possibility is that the cent was tooled or messed with in some way - perhaps someone had some fun playing around with the date? I inherited a bunch of wheaties a while back from someone who had access to a machine shop and metalworking tools and I could tell that the person, or someone, had a good time messing with the dates and letters on many of the coins. Some of them even resemble the coin posted.
     
    2x2 $averKrazy likes this.
  18. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    Maybe 1919,1929,1939. Harshly cleaned and environmentally damaged.
     
  19. Napoleon1

    Napoleon1 Member


    in the afternoon I will post photos before being cleaned by me. It was silly to have cleaned it ...
     
  20. Napoleon1

    Napoleon1 Member

    It was also my first impression, that's why I did not upload photos on the back.
     
  21. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    Sometimes coins have to be cleaned. Like when I dig one up. If it is a modern face value coin, there's no problem with cleaning it. If your coin had numismatic value,
    it still can be cleaned (conserved properly). But if it had that value, and was cleaned improperly, then that value is lost.
    Unless this was a 1909 S or a plain 1909 VDB, considering the condition, there wasn't much value to conserve anyway.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page