Inside the lower S, outside the upper S is doubled in an offset direction of the second TRUST-T next to it.... a removed W between this double hubbing seems to be the reason.
The 'S' in trust shows signs of a ding, no doubling or "single squeeze side stepping" of doubling. The "W" you mention are extremely minute contact marks with other coins. IMO, Jim
Because of the high and totally unnecessary magnification. If you can see it with a 10x it doesn't exist.
I don’t, but I did have an idea that I would need to make ground up in coin collecting based on rarity, because I didn’t have notable popular acceptability on my side... even though I’ve been a lifelong collector, I only started collecting coins in 2013.
The US Mint meant to try to minimize the possible effects of doubling by the new squeeze. We’re just spoiled on old copper a silver subjects. Whatever form the outcome has, (some doubling is strong, some is the 1984D Cent DDO-001) if TWO evidences overrule me, I listen. It’s much more UNEXPLAINABLE to see a W, the an west offset S, and north offset T and try to argue against the Numismatic Gods and day that there is NO offset doubling during a double hubbing which sees an image removed. They were two different processes that had no control over the other.... doubling had no effect possibility on the removal being there. So they must be looked separately.
@Bobs Tavern Arm Here’s an honest question: How much of your life do you intend to waste on this nonsense?
