Grade opinions on this 1880-O Morgan

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by flyers10, Jan 18, 2008.

  1. flyers10

    flyers10 Collector of US Coinage

    Please take a look at this 1880-O morgan dollar and render your opinion on a grade. Coin has a nice golden toning. Thanks.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Bonedigger

    Bonedigger New Member

    AU-58. I see a little wear on the hair.

    Take Care
    Ben
     
  4. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    I'd call it an MS-60. I believe it's in a GSA holder, but too many marks to qualify for any grade above 61 to be sure. I think what you see Ben is incomplete strike, but as you know, it's hard to say from a picture.
     
  5. Bonedigger

    Bonedigger New Member

    You might have something there, New Orleans mint and all...

    Take Care
    Ben
     
  6. silvrluvr

    silvrluvr Senior Member

    Marks? That coin looks better than most 65s....
     
  7. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    flyers - show 'em a pick of the entire holder.
     
  8. flyers10

    flyers10 Collector of US Coinage

    Actually took that coin out of the holder (not a gsa holder). Just a coinworld holder that someone put a grade on themselves I guess. I needed a 5th coin to send to ANACS for the economy tier so I sent that one in this afternoon.

    Coin looks nicer in hand and I really like that toning. I was thinking it might go anywhere between ms-61 to ms-63.

    Wanted to see how the new ANACS is and I had a few key date lincolns I wanted to get authenicated and graded.

    Thanks for everyones opinion. Any guess from you GDJMSP? You were right on with the last Morgans I put up.
     
  9. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    MS 62 or 63 is my grade. Pretty coin regardless of grade.
     
  10. flyers10

    flyers10 Collector of US Coinage

    Thanks everyone for your opinions and nice comments. ANACS should have it Monday and I should have it back in a month or so and pass what they graded it. Regardless of grade (high AU to MS63) I am happy with the coin for it's eye appeal and it will be a keeper in my collection. :thumb:
     
  11. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I just wanted the folks to know that it was not a GSA. As for grade, the coin has 65 details for an O mint coin. But there is something going on in the fields on that coin and based on the pics I can't tell what it is. It could be cleaning marks it could be scuff marks - just can't tell. But they will make the difference in the grade and what it says on the label.
     
  12. Becky

    Becky Darkslider

    Looks like a micro O too. I like it!:thumb:
     
  13. flyers10

    flyers10 Collector of US Coinage

    Thanks. I see what you are talking about especially on the reverse at the 3 o'clock position. Looks like scuff marks to me. Gets accented due to the toning on the coin. Previous owner had it labeled ms-65 on the slab. Hopefully ANACS goes ms-63 to ms-65 not cleaned.

    Thanks Becky for pointing out the micro O. Was not aware it was the variety.
     
  14. flyers10

    flyers10 Collector of US Coinage

    Well after over 2 months at ANACS got the grades back. Coin came back artifically toned 58 details. Well that was a bummer. 1914-D Lincoln came back 30 details cleaned. Knew it was cleaned but was hoping 35-40. 1970-s small date lincoln which I got out of a mint set came back ms64. 1917 Walking liberty half au58 details cleaned. Thought It might of been lightly cleaned but still a nice coins. Last a 1883-O morgan MS65. Not too bad but a bit dissappointed on the 1880-O.
     
  15. rotobeast

    rotobeast Old Newbie

    I think you got the shaft on the Morgie's details.
    It should have at least got a 64 details, if not better.
    Here's an old ANACS of mine that got a MS-66, for reference.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  16. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator


    It may well have come back that way because of the reverse.
     
  17. grizz

    grizz numismatist

    grade opinions....

    i would have thought 63.

    as far as the tpg's...............different graders different opinions.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page