Help please 70s ddo 44 ddo

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Jay Layton, Apr 30, 2019.

  1. Jay Layton

    Jay Layton Member

    The 70s is it the 101 and the 1944 appears to have class 101 doubling
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Jay Layton

    Jay Layton Member

    70d rpm over s also ddo?
     

    Attached Files:

  4. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    The photos are pixelated and blurry. I am unable to follow what you might be seeing. The 44 looks like some MD on the date.

    There are no known D/S Lincolns for the date. You are most likely seeing some die chips or die deterioration.
     
  5. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Need clearer photos.
     
  6. Jay Layton

    Jay Layton Member

    Better
     

    Attached Files:

  7. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    @Jay Layton ...honestly, based on the pictures you provided, I don't see any doubling on either coin and I can't tell on the rpm.

    I am presuming you meant FS-101 on the 70-S, and that you think you see the same type of doubling on the 44 Philly. When you are posting and asking for help, you need to be clear and specific. Normally, you should post full-size images of both the obverse and the reverse and then additionally post an in-focus close up of the area(s) where you think you are seeing doubling.

    FS-101 for the 70-S shows on IGWT, LIBERTY and the DATE. Your coins do not appear to show any of this. This particular info was found posted by Clawcoins on 31 Mar. 19, you could have searched the CT Forum and found this on your own.

    The question that remains is: Did you mean something else?...Spark
     
  8. Jay Layton

    Jay Layton Member

    My phone’s camera sucks but I do have a magnifying glass
     

    Attached Files:

  9. R_rabbit

    R_rabbit Well-Known Member

    Hi:)
    Thank you for the extra pictures.
    Imho, there is no doubling that I see of . No md. It is just a worn 1944 cent with deterioration.
    Same on the 1970d.
     
  10. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    Too bad about your phone cam. But you can invest 35 bucks and get a usb microscope and take better pictures. My experience tells me one with 3 megapixels or better is what is needed, but you will have to spend more. Research carefully before buying anything.

    No matter which cam or magnifying glass you use, neither of your 2 OP coins exhibit the attributes of a WDDO-001/FS-101 as listed at Wexler, and I am dismayed that you thought they did. Not even close...Spark
     
  11. Jay Layton

    Jay Layton Member

    This is a 92 the reverse appears to be wide am stamped over a close am 92
     

    Attached Files:

  12. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    You need to start a new thread for this new coin...you will have more members see it and offer more help...Spark

    (Could be die deterioration, btw)
     
  13. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    This is a wide AM cent easily identified by the equal spacing between the A and M and the M and E. The close AM will be touching. with a very wide space between the M and E.
    You coin also displays linear plating blisters, and what I suspect is the M you think you see.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page