After $100.00 dollars worth . . .

Discussion in 'Coin Roll Hunting' started by David Post, Apr 8, 2019.

  1. David Post

    David Post Good times

    First can anyone tell me why it is so GD hard to find a 2009 nickle and is anyone else sick of being fooled by 1964 nickles? :woot:
    1943-P front.JPG
    This nickle is almost black . . .
    1943-P back.JPG
    and this one . . .
    1925 front.JPG
    1925 back.JPG
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. TexAg

    TexAg Well-Known Member

    Nice war nickel and buffalo! 2009 nickel and dime mintages were reduced drastically compared to prior and successive years. I keep everyone I find, which for where I live is mostly from Denver.
     
  4. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    How/why are 1964 nickels fooling you?
     
    spirityoda likes this.
  5. CoinBlazer

    CoinBlazer Numismatic Enthusiast

    presumed silver content most likely
     
    toned_morgan likes this.
  6. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    That doesn’t make much sense if you think about it. Even with how plentiful 64’s are, why would they fool anyone while the rest of the earlier non-war dates do not?
     
  7. CoinBlazer

    CoinBlazer Numismatic Enthusiast

    Idk tbh gtg ig
     
  8. David Post

    David Post Good times

    They always look older than they are . . . and there's billions of them and it seems I have them all
     
    toned_morgan likes this.
  9. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    Remember who you’re talking to here, CB. When it comes to things like that I’m like a real-life Mearth. ;)
     
    toned_morgan likes this.
  10. CoinBlazer

    CoinBlazer Numismatic Enthusiast

    I don't know to be honest. Got to go I guess
     
    Stevearino likes this.
  11. toned_morgan

    toned_morgan Toning Lover

    Basically, it seems that half of the planchets for 2009 were taken for 1964. The mintages for 1964 are significantly higher, and for 2009 they are significantly lower (still in the billions, but relatively lower) because of the crash. I think 1964 might have been to annoy collectors.

    The back story to that is that in 1964, as you may know, they announced that coins for 1965 would not be made of silver because the price of silver was rising, and it was becoming to expensive to make silver coins anymore. So collectors got angry, quite obviously, and complained a lot until the mint announced that mint marks would not exist anymore from 1965 to 1967, just to p*ss the community off even more. So I'm guessing they might have made the mintages for 1964 nickels higher so that there was no chance of them being rare, just to further annoy coin collectors. If I'm wrong, please correct me.

    Very nice finds though!
     
  12. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    You don’t know what idk tbh gtg ig means either? ;)

    And since it’s well before your time, here....

     
  13. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    I think these are all D's.
    2009.png
     
  14. TexAg

    TexAg Well-Known Member

    I got everything but "I guess", I thought it was "I'm going". Lol.
     
  15. nickelsorter2017

    nickelsorter2017 Active Member

    You are not wrong, but there's more to the story. In the early 1960s, roll and bag "collecting" started, due to the low purchasing power of 1 and 5 cent coins. This po'ed the government, because it created coin 'shortages.' The two types of 1960 1 cent coins set it in motion... 1964 nickels were minted with the date frozen at 1964 into 1965. The government was concerned that there would be shortages of dimes and quarters in 1965... and that meant that the smaller denominations would be substituted by businesses. Hence, 1964 dated non-silver coins, even in UNC, aren't worth any more than face value if you try to sell them to the average US coin dealer.

    2009 coins stopped being minted before July 4? and the Mint announced it at the time. Dealers rushed out and hoarded the coins. 2009 dated nickels aren't worth more than face value if you try to sell them to the average US coin dealer. That said, 2009 dated nickels are harder to find in circulation than 73 years old 1946 dated nickels. Who knew?
     
    toned_morgan likes this.
  16. Relic Raker

    Relic Raker Well-Known Member

    Man, if the '64 nickel's high mintage number was a jab at collectors, it sure has a long reach.
     
  17. Ottoast

    Ottoast New Member

    Attached Files:

    • 2009.JPG
      2009.JPG
      File size:
      824.1 KB
      Views:
      161
    Michael K likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page