Interesting content and worth a watch. I believe many collectors would support some form of consistent and repeatable grading (like with computers), but it would not be profitable (and would upset the upgrade/crack-out specialists). So, the type of grading we have now will more than likely be what we continue to have.
Ugh here we go again. Let’s grade things on blown up over sized pictures and then not understand the magnification coins are graded at. The majority of collectors want eye appeal despite what some forum people post
Collectors wanting coins with good eye appeal, and collectors wanting the grades of the coins they are looking for skewed upwards (along with the price) because of good eye appeal are two very different things.
