Should I get this GSA graded...

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by BlackberryPie, Mar 12, 2019.

  1. BlackberryPie

    BlackberryPie I like pie

    Or leave in the box as is?
    DSC_0073.JPG DSC_0072.JPG
     
    Nathan401, Paul M. and masterswimmer like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. CoinBlazer

    CoinBlazer Numismatic Enthusiast

    Unless the no longer do, TPGs will grade in GSA holders and add the label near the bottom of the case.
    Should you get it graded? I think I would since it is a CC.
     
    spirityoda likes this.
  4. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    If you decide to grade it, it should be graded with the original government packaging. Very nice CC Morgan.
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  5. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    Go for a grade.
     
  6. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    I'd probably send that one in. It looks like it would get a 65 from NGC. I would not send any GSA's anywhere other than NGC. PCGS slaps another layer of plastic over the original plastic case, and I am not a fan of ANACS. At least with NGC you can have it graded and still keep it in the original GSA Box with certs.

    Those fields are pretty clean and the Liberty's cheek does not look bad either. Those look mostly like luster grazes on a very frosty cheek without much metal displacement. It could even get a 65+ in my opinion.
     
    Paul M. and Jmis like this.
  7. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    Looks nice enough to me to send in.
     
  8. ddoomm1

    ddoomm1 keep on running

    LEAVE IT IN THE ORIGINAL HOLDER (pls)!!!! NGC band is the way to go.
     
  9. BlackberryPie

    BlackberryPie I like pie

    I meant leave it in the GSA cardboard box and put it away. Lol
     
    Noah Finney likes this.
  10. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Only get it graded by NGC, with the stripe around the original holder. I don’t think it is worth grading, as the bag marks on the obverse would limit it to 64. It is a 65 reverse, but given the obverse, I don’t see it better than 64. It is a nice, lustrous coin.
     
    Paul M. and cpm9ball like this.
  11. BoonTheGoon

    BoonTheGoon Grade A mad lad

    Its so nice looking, I would but idk
     
  12. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    I think I’d send it in. Is a high end 64 on a bad day.
     
    Paul M., jtlee321 and BoonTheGoon like this.
  13. Bman33

    Bman33 Well-Known Member

    I'm at 64+
     
    Morgandude11 and Paul M. like this.
  14. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Ditto!

    Chris
     
    Paul_62 and Morgandude11 like this.
  15. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    Yes, go for the NGC stripe grading if you feel that you need to have it graded. It will only get an MS-63, maybe 64 if you were to crack it out have it put in a slab. The 1883-CC is the most common Carson City dollar. It is more of a collectors' item in the government box because so many of them have been cracked.
     
  16. BlackberryPie

    BlackberryPie I like pie

    So the consensus is MS63-65+. Large gap between opinions.
     
  17. Gregg702

    Gregg702 Active Member

    The top photo looks like there is a rim ding to the right hand side of the face on the obverse.
     
  18. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    Yes, I know that Carson City dollars have gotten a push now and then from the graders, but with the marks that this one has on the cheek, if this 1883-CC dollar gets an MS-65 or very close to it, grade-flation will have become an epidemic. There is only so much Kool Aid in the pitcher.
     
  19. ddoomm1

    ddoomm1 keep on running

  20. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    +1, my first impression was a bit higher, but I'm settling here.
     
    ddoomm1 likes this.
  21. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I could live with 64+. It is a high end 64. Still not worth sending in, as it is not a clear 65.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page