1922 Weak D Lincoln Cent Coin - Look real?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Gregg702, Mar 11, 2019.

  1. Gregg702

    Gregg702 Active Member

    Varieties are not one of my strong suits. Does this look like a genuine weak D?
    IMG_1963.jpg IMG_1965.JPG
     
    Noah Finney likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Noah Finney

    Noah Finney Well-Known Member

    Nice coin, I would say It is a genuine coin and maybe not a weak D though.
     
    Last edited: Mar 11, 2019
    TypeCoin971793 and Gregg702 like this.
  4. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Some members can tell by looking at the Reverse.. Show a nice full picture of the other side.
     
    PlanoSteve and LaCointessa like this.
  5. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    The second '2' is slightly weaker, but it might just be a plain 1922-D, the reverse should tell more. Jim
     
    PlanoSteve and LaCointessa like this.
  6. Evan8

    Evan8 A Little Off Center

  7. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Looks like a normal but worn 1922-D. There is too much D for the weak D variety.
     
  8. Gregg702

    Gregg702 Active Member

    A8B21592-7AC5-4AE5-BE8F-A7DF2AACBD77.jpeg
    This is the reverse if that helps.
     
  9. Evan8

    Evan8 A Little Off Center

    Just a normal 1922 D. Gotta remember, there were a lot of poorly stuck wheats through the 1920s, especially at the branch mints Denver and San Francisco. It is more common than you think to see weak mintmarks for whatever reason on wheat cents through this period. However, this does not appear to be one of the three die pairs that did infact strike the so called weak D.

    So basically we can say that your coin could be a slightly filled die or just circulation wear, or a combination of both. But not a true weak D. Hope this helps.
     
    Gregg702 likes this.
  10. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

  11. Gregg702

    Gregg702 Active Member

    Thanks
     
  12. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    On a weak D, it's REALLY hard to see it if at all.

    1922weakDdate.jpg
     
  13. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    It looks like a normal 1922-D to me. The real thing really looks moth eaten. You coin is “too nice.”
     
  14. Mike Thorne

    Mike Thorne Well-Known Member

    The D is not weak enough to be a weak D.
     
    eddiespin likes this.
  15. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    I agree. It needs a little more circulation wear. :)
     
  16. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

  17. NAVY CHIEF

    NAVY CHIEF Active Member

    found this one cent 1922 No "D" > 60 years age. Is it a 1922 No D??
     

    Attached Files:

  18. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    There's so much wear, you need better photos.
    Even 60 years ago people were removing the D.
    Right now it's difficult to say because of condition.
    Better clear and crisp photos might help.
     
    Seattlite86 likes this.
  19. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

  20. NAVY CHIEF

    NAVY CHIEF Active Member

    Looked at the coin using 10x & 20x magnification- will sent coin to be graded.
     
  21. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    Please update us here with photos when it comes back.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page