That wing is too distracting. If it has color then I say yes to the star, if it is a carbon spot then no.
Tough one, I question the toning. But if NGC passed it, I think this series could rate a star for this kind of toning. So I vote star worthy.
That’s a tough one. If it’s too good to be true... I’d say QC, so no star. It’s a very nice Walker though.
Summary: Rd. 1: 1955-S MS 64 1c (NO Star) --> Should it star? -->Yes: 2 vs No: 11 Rd. 2: 1885-O MS 65 $1 (NO Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 4 vs No: 3 Rd. 3: 1813 50c (NO Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 2 vs No: 9 Rd. 4: 1835 50c (Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 1 vs No: 4 Rd. 5: 1821 50c (Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 2 vs No: 4 Rd. 6: 1947-D 5c (NO Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 6 vs No: 2 Rd. 7: 1882-S $1 MS 63 (Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 0 vs No: 8 Rd. 8: 1882-S $1 MS 67 (NO Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 2 vs No: 8 Rd. 9: Darth Morgan (NO Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 1 vs No: 5 Rd. 10: 1820 Cent (NO Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 2 vs No: 5 Rd. 11: Swiss Silver (NO Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 1 vs No: 4 Rd. 12: 1940 50c (Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 4 vs No: 3 Totals: No Star currently on holder, but deserves it: 2 No Star currently on holder and doesn't deserve it: 6 Star currently on holder and deserves it: 1 Star currently on holder, but doesn't deserve it: 3 ------ Non-toned/PL category: ~ 1871 5c (Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 5 vs No: 1
The last one was close and I had to interpret some answers. For future rounds, please try to make a call on if you think the coin deserves a star, not what the holder might say. The reason is that this thread attempts to gather opinions on if coins deserve the star or do not. We aren't trying to guess what NGC said, but what the people on here think.
And now another world coin... (Note: world coins became eligible around 2014 for stars according to the NGC website and I believe this holder is from before 2014). Video here: https://www.instagram.com/p/BtFF95Wl3rC/ And two more photos:
My guess is that it would now, but NGC only expanded the star to world coins in 2014. And this holder appears to be from before 2014. https://www.ngccoin.com/news/article/3798/Star-designation/
Summary: Rd. 1: 1955-S MS 64 1c (NO Star) --> Should it star? -->Yes: 2 vs No: 11 Rd. 2: 1885-O MS 65 $1 (NO Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 4 vs No: 3 Rd. 3: 1813 50c (NO Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 2 vs No: 9 Rd. 4: 1835 50c (Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 1 vs No: 4 Rd. 5: 1821 50c (Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 2 vs No: 4 Rd. 6: 1947-D 5c (NO Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 6 vs No: 2 Rd. 7: 1882-S $1 MS 63 (Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 0 vs No: 8 Rd. 8: 1882-S $1 MS 67 (NO Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 2 vs No: 8 Rd. 9: Darth Morgan (NO Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 1 vs No: 5 Rd. 10: 1820 Cent (NO Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 2 vs No: 5 Rd. 11: Swiss Silver (NO Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 1 vs No: 4 Rd. 12: 1940 50c (Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 4 vs No: 3 Rd. 13: Israel Lira (NO Star*^) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 4 vs No: 0 Totals: No Star currently on holder, but deserves it: 3 No Star currently on holder and doesn't deserve it: 6 Star currently on holder and deserves it: 1 Star currently on holder, but doesn't deserve it: 3 ------ Non-toned/PL category: ~ 1871 5c (Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 5 vs No: 1 ------ *^ = signifies a coin that was most likely graded before the star designation was used for its respective series
Here is a filler coin (until someone else comes up with something). This was in a NGC holder before I crossed it over to PCGS. This is one of the few images where the True Views are conservative. The coin looks even better in hand.