1943 Walking Liberty Proof ? I read there non exsistent well what is this ? A PROOF!!

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by freethinker2016, Feb 14, 2019.

?

Please tell me your opinion is this a Proof ,they say they dont exsist,what do you think now ?

  1. Yes

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. Or no

    6 vote(s)
    100.0%
  1. Hey everyone I have had this coin fpr many years . I was going thru some coin last night .so I pull out this 1943 walking liberty coin. , I said wow look at this POP . I know and have read there are no 1943 walking liberty proofs . Please tell me what I have
    Thanks
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    can't tell anything from those photos. It is most likely polished and would get a Bus. Strike details grade.
     
    -jeffB likes this.
  4. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Not a proof. The entire coin is shiny. A proof would not look this way. The raised areas would not be shiny. This coin is damaged as it's been polished.
     
    -jeffB and Randy Abercrombie like this.
  5. MeowtheKitty

    MeowtheKitty Well-Known Member

    Meow thinks so too. The high wear points like the hand and the leg are flat. No chest feathers on the reverse too.
     
    -jeffB likes this.
  6. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    That's a well-worn, and then polished to mirror-finish waste of a perfectly good piece of 90% silver. It would look out of place anywhere . . . yes, even in a bag of 90%.
     
    Gilbert, JPeace$, Paul M. and 2 others like this.
  7. Clawcoins

    Clawcoins Damaging Coins Daily

    you asked ....
    Yes, I agree with the above.
    Highly polished. When someone highly polishes a coin you lose fine details which get rounded in a sense. Compare it to a more crusted looking one and look at the fine details.
     
  8. CoinBlazer

    CoinBlazer Numismatic Enthusiast

    If a coin is made in 1943, and for 76 years, collectors have agreed that a proof strike doesn't exist. It doesn't exist
     
    Inspector43 likes this.
  9. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    If "shiny" meant "proof", I'd be at home with a rag and some polish "proofing up" all sorts of coins.
     
  10. CoinBlazer

    CoinBlazer Numismatic Enthusiast

    Proof 1801-1803 Dollars? They are more rare than the 1804!
     
  11. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    Assuming all photos are the same coin, the one in the flip reveals the curved edge whereas a proof has right angle edges and is not off center, so I would go business strike. Jim
     
  12. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Really going out on a limb there for a 1943 coin, aren't we? :rolleyes:

    Or maybe there was a top-secret Allied plan to re-introduce proof strikes in 1943, and all the records of die preparation, planchet preparation, striking, and distribution were carefully destroyed. No evidence left at all, except for this coin -- which unfortunately had its edges rounded, and was circulated, and then was polished. So they almost managed to cover their tracks!
     
  13. l.cutler

    l.cutler Member

    That is definitely not a proof. Take a look at the lack of detail on the high points of the design.
     
  14. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    Its to be expected as they didn't have YouTube or CoinTalk and the Redbook was 3 years away! Even Doug wasn't born yet :) How could they succeed?
     
    Randy Abercrombie and Heavymetal like this.
  15. JPeace$

    JPeace$ Coinaholic

    Heavily polished business strike. Sorry.
     
  16. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Sadly polished within an inch of its life. As-is, it's basically worth the silver value alone. ($5.71 as of this post.)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page