Any "tells" for dateless SLQs?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by TylerH, Feb 6, 2019.

  1. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Certainly not for SLQs. But the 1916 issue has pickup points that you can distinguish long after the date is gone, so there's never any need to "restore" anything to prove you have a 1916. (If the coin is worn enough that you can't see the hair, the foot, or the drape, it's a lost cause.)

    If there are no stars and there's a mintmark, it's 1917.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Packrat

    Packrat Well-Known Member

    A friend told me 2 parts vinegar, 1 part hydrogen peroxide for 24 hours. A stronger peroxide would be quicker. I have not tried it yet.

    In the 60's I used Nic-A-Silver. It is no longer produced and no one in the coin supply business remembers it. It had limited effectiveness. Best luck was bringing up the date on a three cent silver piece or bringing out the mint mark on a Mercury dime. Changing a 1921 P to a 1921 D was beneficial, but I could never get a D to show up on a 1916 dime. It did not "etch" the metal like Nic-A-Date does on buffaloes. But it would stain your hands purple to black if you touched the chemical and you just had to let it wear off.
     
  4. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    I remember you bringing this up in an earlier thread. I was speculating about nitric acid, but based on what I've read since, I'm wondering if it was iodine-based. But even that would stain your hands orange, not purple, I think. It's been a long time since I've played with iodine. (And now it's been annexed into the ever-growing meth precursor list, so it's hard to get, and likely to draw the wrong kind of attention.)
     
  5. Oldhoopster

    Oldhoopster Member of the ANA since 1982

    I tried H2SO4, HNO3 and HF in the chem lab when I was in grad school and never had any luck with SLQs. I don't think I ever tried glacial acetic acid or H2O2, however.

    BTW: I would occasionally dip my pocket change and then spend it. Did that a long time ago, so I don't think they're showing up on CT :blackeye: :rolleyes: But I did keep a couple Gold/Palladium sputter coated nickels. Just tossed them in the sputtering unit while prepping my SEM samples
     
    -jeffB likes this.
  6. TylerH

    TylerH Well-Known Member

    I started with JUST vinegar, as a sort of baseline. Adding hydrogen peroxide tonight at 1:1, then in 24 more hours Ill go to 2:1
     
  7. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    I'm just wondering why use any sort of metal when glass is available?
     
  8. TylerH

    TylerH Well-Known Member

    just what I had on hand.
     
  9. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Stainless steel holds up to vinegar better than aluminum pans, but glass is definitely best. In fact, it's quite possible the steel could destabilize the peroxide once you add it, reducing its effectiveness. (No explosions in any case, but maybe some fizzing.)
     
  10. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    BTW, when talking about peroxide, I would assume that people are referring to the 3% stuff in the brown bottle under the sink in the bathroom...actually you can buy 9% at beauty supply stores. If you get the 3% on your hands, no biggie, but the 9% stuff can start to tingle and turn your skin dead white. Our staple in the lab was 30% and we had 50, 70 and 98% in the refrigerator.
     
  11. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    I believe you can still buy 27% at pool supply stores.

    But you probably shouldn't.
     
  12. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    ...that would be wicked...
     
  13. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

    Interesting
     
  14. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    I don't think 27% is strong enough to go "boom" under any circumstances, but it will jump up to greet you if it hits the wrong catalyst.
     
  15. TylerH

    TylerH Well-Known Member

    Well 24 hours in vinegar did very little. I THINK I can see the 2 in 1920-something now though. Added hydrogen peroxide and now just waiting.
     
  16. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    ...nah, didn't mean it would go BOOM, just that it would not be nice to your skin. In graduate school we made peroxides from H2O2 and cyclohexanone. To see if they were pure, we put a pinch on the lab bench and tapped it with a hammer. If it went boom, it was good, if not, recrystallize...
     
    Oldhoopster likes this.
  17. TylerH

    TylerH Well-Known Member

    WELL - 24 hours in Hydrogen peroxide and vinegar DESTROYED the coin - HOWEVER - the date is now TOTALLY VISABLE

    1923

    IMG_0733.JPG

    AND MY HEART BREAKS AT HOW F'ED UP IT IS NOW
     
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2019
    NSP, -jeffB and TypeCoin971793 like this.
  18. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    It’s still worth a ton more now than as a slick cull
     
    CircCam likes this.
  19. TylerH

    TylerH Well-Known Member

    I gently ran my thumb over it under some water (I mean, it wont hurt it at this point) and a bit of the grey washed off so its not as bad looking now

    IMG_0734.JPG IMG_0735.JPG
     
    -jeffB, CircCam and TypeCoin971793 like this.
  20. TylerH

    TylerH Well-Known Member

    And there ya have it - Key date found in culls. (For better or worse)

    IMG_0736.JPG
     
    NSP, -jeffB, CircCam and 1 other person like this.
  21. TylerH

    TylerH Well-Known Member

    All said and done though - THis would be a kick-butt filler for someone doing a lowball SLQ set ;)
     
    CircCam and TypeCoin971793 like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page