What grade is this mercury dime? I might be a bit too optimistic in saying that it could be MS65 FB, so I wanted your opinions. Thanks for any help!
That's one fine lookin coin you got there! I give it a solid 65 and if it weren't for the line over the head and the sqiggles under EPU, an easy 66.
I think the answer to your question is completely luster dependent. If the coin has gem luster it should be MS65FB. Unfortunately, I can't say with any confidence that the luster is that good based on those photos.
I'm going to say MS65FB if sent in. The line which idk if is on the holder or the coin hurts it. Also I can't tell if that's a scratch or in relief above her wing. But that cheek is just smooth as a baby's behind. Personally, I think it *should* grade it MS64+ considering those three flaws.
I wonder if the seller is known to take realistic pictures of their coins or if they play with the images. I honestly don’t know as I’ve never bought anything from them.
Yes, those absolutely have the appearance of cleaning hairlines. First thing I noticed was the obverse scratch above Liberty's head, but when I scrolled down those hairlines are prominent and extensive. UNC details, harshly cleaned from me.
Jason, what about the metal flow in left and right Obverse fields? This is why I didn't immediately think harshly cleaned. My eye was "drawn" to the scratch too.
The obverse is fine, except for the scratch. We aren't talking about the obverse. We're talking about the reverse. A coin can be very harshly cleaned in just one area, and the rest of the coin will look fine. Look at those fine diagonal lines that extend from the letters "TED ST" into the field, over the leaves, and across the fasces. Those aren't supposed to be there. Those fine, tight, perpendicular lines that go over the devices and into the fields are an absolute sure sign of cleaning.
That's where this one gets you - the pictures are detailed enough that you can see some of the metal flow, like we've been talking about in the luster thread. You have to look carefully to catch the sudden change in direction in the reverse top left quadrant. If you were able to rotate this one in the light, that should stick out like a stubbed toe. Fortunately, these pictures are actually pretty high quality, and you can see the hairlines very clearly. You just have to concentrate on the details and subtleties.
Yes, in hand it would probably be more apparent. Now that you mention it there's a very subtle "area" I now see where the hairlines begin and blend into the flow. Thanks Jason. I'm always learning something new.