Two separate dates (1976, 1975) shown in Proof Set

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by sham, Dec 31, 2018.

  1. sham

    sham Member

    Here is a picture of a Proof Set received from the dealer - supposed to be 1976 Proof Set. But the three smaller denominations (1C, 5C and 10C) are shown to be dated 1975.
    Assuming the set hasn't been tampered with ( why would anyone tamper in such fashion) is it supposed to be a rare thing and would it command any premium.
    How to test positively for any tampering - looks good to me. PC070178.JPG PC070184.JPG PC070178.JPG PC070184.JPG
     
    Hookman likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER


    The dual-date 25c, 50c & $1 were used for both years - 1975 and 1976 - for the Bicentennial Set. The 1c, 5c & 10c were struck for each year. What you have is a 1975 Proof Set.

    Chris
     
  4. Sullysullinburg

    Sullysullinburg Well-Known Member

    It’s a 1975 proof set. In 1975 no quarters, halfs or, dollars were made with the date 1975. All were the 1776-1976 to keep up with high demand.
     
    SchwaVB57 and Hookman like this.
  5. sham

    sham Member

     
  6. sham

    sham Member

    Thank you for explaining this to me.
     
  7. Hookman

    Hookman Well-Known Member

    This is just a guess , but...
    Many of these Bi-centennial proof sets were actually minted in 1975. As you can see, only the major coins have the 1776 - 1976 dates, the other, minor coins, have the actual minting year of 1975. Thus, this is an untampered with, proof set, that was put together at the mint in 1975. Some might call it an " Early Release ".

    That is my best guess, however, there are many members of Coin Talk !! who have much more experience with these sets than I do, and they will be able to give you a much more definitive answer than I can.

    Thanks for posting such an inquisitive, and ultimately informing, question.
    Welcome to Coin Talk !!
     
  8. Hookman

    Hookman Well-Known Member

    Wow, so many with such faster fingers than I !! lol
     
  9. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I just saw this but it's already been explained.
     
  10. CoinCorgi

    CoinCorgi Tell your dog I said hi!

    Also, the Ike $1 is a Type 1 most likely. If I remember correctly, weren't all '75 proof set Ike's Type 1?
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2018
    mikenoodle likes this.
  11. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    Yes, and the 76 sets were Type II
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page