This appears to be a very nice coin. With the crack in the chin, would you think that one of the graders would be deterred about the grading .
I’m more inclined to believe that’s a clash mark instead of a crack. Could be wrong. My bigger concerns are the scratches east of the chin and the color of the coin is off for the wear it shows. I go AU details.
That scratch on Liberty's chin looks like somebody shot her in the lung and she's bleeding from the mouth. Morbid, I know. Sorry.
The crack, clash or scratch is not visible on the actual coin without magnification, nor does it look cleaned. However there is a hit on the 9 as in 1916.
I can't imagine a clash transferring detail into a spot that deep on the die. Struck through thread, maybe? Also, what's happening at the reverse rim above "S OF"?
Let me try and I welcome corrections. Dipped, more specifically over-dipped coins have a very "white" appearance, but look somewhat dead with no luster or even shine.
Can I vote 12? If it is AU, would it have been dipped for any other reason than to remove dark unattractive toning? Seems to have retoned slightly bluish.
I voted "12" in the poll. Three times. I don't think that coin will straight-grade due to the scratches and possible old cleaning, as mentioned, but it does have nice detail. Not a good candidate for slabbing, but would be a nice coin for a raw collection in an album. Speaking of scratched 1916-D Barber quarters, I found one while metal detecting an old house site once. I dug and saw the edge of the coin peeking out of the dirt in the side of the hole, so I pulled it out. Unfortunately it was resting on top of a small, unseen rock, so I scratched it when I pulled it out of the side of the hole.
Well My'Lord, you sure know how to hurt a guy. I don't think I have enough money to build a raw collection as good as this one coin looks. Dave