“Live or Memorex”? 1927-s Liberty Standing Quarter

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Jack D. Young, Dec 11, 2018.

  1. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    We have started a regular discussion post on a FB page I am a member of where we look at images of 3 different examples of a coin “variety” and the group comments on which is real and which is fake and why. These key date 1927-S quarters are from the next discussion post there; of the 3 illustrated examples 2 are determined counterfeits, one most likely the repaired source example.

    I am asking that group to try and review the images as if you are a grader for one of the TPGs and dealing with any time constraints they may have!

    Good luck, this one is rather tricky (not trying to make any excuses for the several that were slabbed as genuine…)- the answers as I see them will be posted later!

    IMG_20180903_112138.jpg
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Randy Abercrombie

    Randy Abercrombie Supporter! Supporter

    I am typically wrong when I do these. If I had these three to choose from I would reject Examples one and three. I don't like the surface of the fields on these two.
     
    KevinM likes this.
  4. heavycam.monstervam

    heavycam.monstervam Outlaw Trucker & Coin Hillbilly

    I was going to say #2 is the real deal but for a totally different reason- the designers initial, looks funny on #1 & #3
     
  5. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    Unfortunately image quality can have an impact when working only from pictures...
     
    Paul M. and Randy Abercrombie like this.
  6. Numismat

    Numismat World coin enthusiast

    These images are definitely hard to work with, partly because the rims are partially obscured on two examples. If I had to guess I'd also go with 2, but what's with the forehead horns? You're sure one of them is genuine right?

    nice_tuopee.jpg
     
    Paul M. and Jack D. Young like this.
  7. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    Like I state in my Coin Week articles I am sure at least 2 of these are fakes! I will show which one I believe to be genuine based on toning and appearance compared to the one known to be genuine in the research on these.
     
    Paul M. and Numismat like this.
  8. Numismat

    Numismat World coin enthusiast

    I think I missed the "variety" part at first. In that case I'll go with example 1 as the genuine :)

    Edit: The more I look at them, the more I go back to example 2. Good brain teaser.
     
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2018
    Jack D. Young likes this.
  9. TheMiz

    TheMiz Member

    2 = genuine. 1&3 are counterfeit
     
  10. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    One thing I found interesting from the research is the scratch on the eagle's wing of example #2 is not seen on the others...

    Untitled-2-scratch.jpg
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  11. KevinM

    KevinM Well-Known Member

    That was my initial thoughts the 2nd one looks like normal wear
     
    Randy Abercrombie likes this.
  12. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    I also guess #2.
     
  13. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    Agree
     
  14. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    OK, we have seen source coins used to make the dies for these, with the majority of tooling/ repairs and circulation marks transferred directly into the struck counterfeits. With only images in hand we look for unique marks (scratches, etc.) and toning to help distinguish one from the other.

    The time-line for the 5 known examples to date (with this post example #’s) is:

    Time-line.jpg
     
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2018
    Paul M. likes this.
  15. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    On coin #1, I see a depression over the eagle’s beak. Is that diagnostic?
     
  16. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    Do you see a similar depression over this example?

    holed.jpg

    The genuine source coin.
     
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2018
    Paul M. likes this.
  17. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    One thing's for sure:
    Example 3 is a counterfeit.
     
    Jack D. Young likes this.
  18. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    The picture is grainy and at a different light angle, but there might be something there.

    Coin #1:

    65408B46-83F1-4F39-B6F6-69089B867544.jpeg

    Source coin:

    6C950120-2241-4B7E-9D6C-59D51F5D9278.jpeg
     
    Paul M. and Jack D. Young like this.
  19. Mountain Man

    Mountain Man Well-Known Member

  20. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    I tossed out #2 because of the straight leg on the 7. The downstroke of the 7 should be curved.
     
  21. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    I decided to go with a quick look and my gut reaction, so I'll say 1-fake, 2-gen, 3 fake. Let the chips fall where they may!
     
    Jack D. Young likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page