GTG 1945-S Jefferson Nickel

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Lehigh96, Dec 4, 2018.

?

Guess the Assigned Grade

  1. MS65

  2. MS65 5FS

  3. MS65+

  4. MS65+ 5FS

  5. MS66

  6. MS66 5FS

  7. MS66+

  8. MS66+ 5FS

  9. MS67

  10. MS67 5FS

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. wxcoin

    wxcoin Getting no respect since I was a baby

    Pretty coin but full steps? I can't see how the photo can be that far off.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Paul, why is this one a 66 and those others we were talking about yesterday were 67s? To me, from the pictures, this one looks to be higher quality.
     
  4. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    It is higher quality. The luster on war nickels is off the charts because the alloy used. Also, the coins strike better because the alloy is softer resulting in less remnant planchet roughness although there is usually still a little on the jaw line, this coin is no exception. Both PCGS & NGC are tougher on pre-war and war nickels than they are on post-war coins with respect to luster and surface preservation. This coin has 67 (or better) luster, strike, and eye appeal, but there are just too many little nicks for a 67 grade.

    That said, I have seen coins with worse surfaces graded MS67 by NGC and personally think this coin should be at least MS66+ 5FS. The other problem is that the price from 66 to 67 jumps from several hundred to several thousand. I think they get very stingy when it comes to top pop registry quality full step nickels.
     
  5. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Thanks. Just another reason I guess I'll let you buy all the nickels ;)
     
    1916D10C likes this.
  6. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    You gotta start teaching me about Franklin Half Dollars, my brother and I are starting a collection, and I’m kinda winging it
     
    1916D10C likes this.
  7. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Absolutely, man. PM me with any questions you have.

    Given your high level of knowledge and proficiency with 20th century coinage, jumping into Franklins won't be hard at all.
     
    Lehigh96 and 1916D10C like this.
  8. asheland

    asheland The Silver Lion

    I guessed 66, but not steps.
     
  9. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    Shortly after this thread was posted I voted 65/5fs...I now retract that vote, having taken a closer look.

    I agree with the nickel experts that this coin looks a 67, but that full step attribution is wrong, imo.
    There is not a single step that does not have an occlusion of some sort, and the center of the reverse was struck very poorly, evidence the columns, and the lower steps.

    I've read, and it seems in this case, that the TPGs make allowances for "as struck" die results, but this seems to be in no way a full step strike...Spark
     
  10. 1916D10C

    1916D10C Key Date Mercs are Life! 1916-D/1921-D/1921

    I think you'd have to see the coin in hand to see the full steps.......

     
  11. SlipperySocks

    SlipperySocks Well-Known Member

    Does this coin not have an slightly overpolished obverse?
     
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2018
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page