Discovery of a new series in Ptolemy Bronze.

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Col Davidson, Nov 24, 2018.

  1. Col Davidson

    Col Davidson Member

    Hi All,

    Some time back I noticed a Ptolemy bronze coin for sale and fortunately was able to purchase it. It has a diameter of between 16.31 and 17.13 mm with a weight of 2.80 grams and is in rather rough condition.. What directed me to the coin was its obverse – to me it appeared to show not the god Zeus but a Ptolemaic king. One coin does not a series make so I checked numerous illustrations of coins for something similar and finally found an astonishingly similar match with coin #20 on Plate 6 of “The lotus of Aphrodite on Ptolemaic bronzes” by Dr Catharine Lorber. That coin is 19.0 mm in diameter with a weight of 4.34 grams and is in the ANS collection (1944.100.78967, Philipsen coll.). This second coin appears to have been struck from the same dies as my coin and I contacted Dr Lorber and sent her photographs and details of my coin.

    Dr Catherine Lorber was extremely helpful and is of the opinion that the obverse shows a Ptolemaic king in the guise of Zeus-Ammon (that is, she reads the ram's horn on the king’s head as representing an assimilation of Zeus-Ammon to a Ptolemaic king) and that he has an unusual type of beard that leaves the chin bare but covers the back part of the jaw. This type of beard is not normal for Zeus or Zeus-Ammon but appears on late portraits of Ptolemaic kings. She mentions that it is unexpected to find this kind of cryptic portrait on a bronze coin and wonders what might have motivated the production of a bronze issue with such special iconography.(Dr Lorber is, to me, the current "Great" in the field of Ptolemaic numismatics).

    The actual Ptolemy and the period of the coin are still in question. The lack of dimples would normally point to it being after 110BC but ptolemybronze.com shows and mentions a number of bronze coins dating to about 137BC which also have no dimple (Sv1624, Sv1628, etc). Regarding the unusual eagle – I have seen a coin of Ptolemy VIII with a somewhat similar tail and, regarding the king’s head with the “under the chin beard”, I found an illustration of a statue of Ptolemy IX with an under the chin beard – then I found one of Ptolemy X with a similar beard – then I found a statue of Ptolemy IX that was thought to be an altered statue of Ptolemy X with the same beard – then I gave up.

    Attached are photos of my coin and of that in the ANS Collection (Courtesy of the American Numismatic Society).

    My coin, and its brother from the ANS Collection, appear to be a new series of a Ptolemaic king yet to be determined. At the present time they appear to have a population of two coins in total. Hopefully more examples will be found, one of which might be a dateable example, and so give us an idea of just who this king was. Otherwise he will remain just one of the hundreds of mysteries in the Ptolemaic bronzes.

    Perhaps the members of Coin Talk know of other examples. Comments would be appreciated.

    All the best,
    Col
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. cmezner

    cmezner do ut des Supporter

    By its weight and diameter it could be a Dichalkon. Maybe you can find it at
    http://ptolemybronze.com/ptolemy_series.html
     
  4. Orfew

    Orfew Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus

    An interesting coin. Thanks for posting it here. I do not have any Ptolemaic coins in my collection yet. I have admired the "hockey pucks" that some on here have shown.
     
  5. Nicholas Molinari

    Nicholas Molinari Well-Known Member

    If you want to continue the research and put out a theory, this would make a great article for KOINON.
     
    Orfew and Roman Collector like this.
  6. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

    Thanks for the heads-up! Interesting coin-- I'll keep a watch for more.
     
    Orfew, Alegandron and Roman Collector like this.
  7. tartanhill

    tartanhill Well-Known Member

    137BC is not after 110BC.
     
  8. ancient coin hunter

    ancient coin hunter 3rd Century Usurper

    Very interesting coin and possibly almost unique. Great find!
     
  9. Alegandron

    Alegandron "ΤΩΙ ΚΡΑΤΙΣΤΩΙ..." ΜΕΓΑΣ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣ, June 323 BCE

    I dunno... I'm scared! Are you scared??? She is going to go GET THEM ALL!!!

    (or at least all the GOOD ones... :) )
    upload_2018-11-25_16-28-1.png
     
  10. Puckles

    Puckles Cat Whisperer

    Depends on which direction you're going!
     
  11. tartanhill

    tartanhill Well-Known Member

    "The lack of dimples would normally point to it being after 110BC but ptolemybronze.com shows and mentions a number of bronze coins dating to about 137BC which also have no dimple." And 137BC still comes before 110BC not after.
     
  12. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

    I think the OP is saying that this coin and a few others points to the likelihood of an earlier date than previously thought for coins which have no dimple. It reads correctly to me.

    I seem to have accumulated a bunch of common Alexandrian-struck issues, mainly thanks to a group lot. The really interesting ones are those which were struck elsewhere under the Ptolemies or which have iconography other than Zeus-Ammon/eagle :).
     
    Last edited: Nov 27, 2018
    Alegandron and Roman Collector like this.
  13. tartanhill

    tartanhill Well-Known Member

  14. Alegandron

    Alegandron "ΤΩΙ ΚΡΑΤΙΣΤΩΙ..." ΜΕΓΑΣ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣ, June 323 BCE

    I really enjoy your focus in Egyptian coins. When @Col Davidson posted his cool coin, I immediately thought of your collection. I also thought that I needed one too!!! (Let’s keep @zumbly out of this :) )

    This was a popular saying when my 6 daughters were growing up...

    upload_2018-11-27_8-49-11.png
     
    Last edited: Nov 27, 2018
    TIF and zumbly like this.
  15. Beginner345

    Beginner345 Active Member

    I love Ptolemy Bronze coins. They are so large . Very ancient looking.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page