A new buy, and GTG. Oregon Commem.

Mine, for comparison purposes ('65 with a gold bean).......

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Shoot.........I do see the 'wear on the rifle, as well as the knee/thigh

 

Yours clearly has unbroken luster. Looking at mine, the surfaces have more of a satiny look. Let's see if my larger images of my coin are helpful. click on the 'nails.

 

Closeups show minimal wear on the obv.

 

kinda late, but im still not that far advanced.
at . maybe.as if someone helped it.
on the other hand, great idea, if AT true.

 

Injuns didnt have rifles

 

I was holding off becz I thought I saw scratches on the top back of the wagon, and several flattened spots when I compared it to my examples. Interesting though the 2nd "T" in States looks like a greased filled die ?

 

I'd give it a 65...really nice eye appeal.

 

Originally ... but they ended up having them over time such as the Little Bighorn fight.
http://www.historynet.com/battle-of-little-bighorn-were-the-weapons-the-deciding-factor.htm

 

Indeed. The Iroquois were using flintlock muskets all the way back in the 1600’s.

 

au 58.

 

I nailed it. Could see the worn leg. Thigh

 

I guessed right for a change. Felt stupid after i read all your guesses. I didn't cheat

 

Wow green. You really blew that one. Yours is way better. Just look at the hand

 

Wow green. You really blew that one. Yours is way better. Just look at the hand

 

Oh and thats a bow

 

I don't see any marks on the top of the wagon. But I think you may be right about the T in STATES. Thanks for the comments!

 

After a few bourbons it could be a star wars blaster.....right Ken? before bourbon....
after bourbon.

 

What the devil is the matter with me...........a bow.

And for you young folks. The native Americans had a way with getting a hold of 'arms'. Google Braddock........

 

Ken looks hot in feathers @green18. And paper head gear