1982 D Copper small date???

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Chad Sr, Nov 16, 2018.

  1. Chad Sr

    Chad Sr New Member

    I found this coin while searching rolls from a bank. It's obviously worn and it looks like the 2 is over a 3. It weighs as copper should. 3.0. Any thoughts.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Chad Sr

    Chad Sr New Member

  4. Chad Sr

    Chad Sr New Member

    Here is another photo
     
  5. Saphire7

    Saphire7 contenial congress member

    photo needs to be better for inspection.. concentrate on the date or the 2.. could be but cant tell by photo. cool
     
  6. Chad Sr

    Chad Sr New Member

    Here's another try 20181116_221402.jpg
     
  7. Saphire7

    Saphire7 contenial congress member

    first is lg........................2nd small
    looks lg . hold it and go for a complete set. 8 total coins
     

    Attached Files:

  8. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    @furryfrog02 - 2 over a 3? Have any idea what that means? o_O
     
  9. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

  10. Saphire7

    Saphire7 contenial congress member

    counterfit, ?
     
  11. Chad Sr

    Chad Sr New Member

    ???? I DON'T think so but the 2 is definitely unlike the other large dates I've compared it to.
     
  12. XanthenX

    XanthenX Active Member

    Most definitely a large date variety, as it is a rather common find for the year. This is an example of a small date variety out of the Denver Mint;

    15424513885471133933607.jpg

    Of course mine is a high mintage zinc, just one of several found in my endless searching of rolls from several locations around my hometown in North Florida. I always keep an easily affordable digital scale in my kit to weigh 1982 D cents and any and all subsequent year and mintage specimens that appear to have characteristics of being struck on that ever elusive stray copper planchet. As of yet I have found a total of zero and do not expect to ever find one, still I check when the thickness (usually caused from the strike with the rim being raised and causing the planchet to appear thicker though it has just displaced more metal along the edges) and tone just stands out like a copper coin. Really the ring says it all, but on a coin with the potential for a higher grade you don't really take the idea of just dropping a specimen so nonchalantly!!

    I am a lowly beginner only having a little more than a year of field experience and study of specific desirable die varieties and vital information regarding their identification; but my opinion is that you should never relent on your search for those rarest of specimens. Those who find them are usually going to be those who continually dedicate the time and effort in doing so. If you fail in the quest; which is to seek, so too shall you find absolutely nothing.
     
  13. Saphire7

    Saphire7 contenial congress member

    is this what u seek...
    just trying to help in description
     

    Attached Files:

  14. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    You're really not helping o_O
     
  15. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    The counterfeit statement had nothing to do with you coin. Your Cent is real.
     
    Saphire7 likes this.
  16. Saphire7

    Saphire7 contenial congress member

    thx 98,
     
  17. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    That is one of those experimental two thirds cents that the mint was toying around with making back around the time of the switch from copper to zinc ;)
     
    paddyman98 likes this.
  18. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Considering it is a large date and 1983 hubs and dies didn't even exist at the time this coin was struck.......
     
    paddyman98 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page