Overgraded WLH?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by John Skelton, Nov 6, 2018.

  1. John Skelton

    John Skelton Morgan man!

    This Walking Liberty Half was graded probably by the auctioneer. This is the second coin I bought and I'd like your thoughts about it.
    Walking Liberty 1941D  001B.jpg
    Walking Liberty 1941D 002B.jpg
     
    thomas mozzillo likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    What did he grade it? Looks XF'ish to me.
     
    TypeCoin971793 likes this.
  4. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    By the guess of a scanned image and the marks in the field, I’d guess AU53, from a non collector of WLHs
     
    TheFinn and Paul M. like this.
  5. kanga

    kanga 65 Year Collector

    Okay, 1941-D.
    The mints weren't striking them very well that year.
    I agree with AU-53 but with enough wiggle room to go -50 or -55.
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  6. furham

    furham Good Ole Boy

    AU-50
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  7. SilverDollar2017

    SilverDollar2017 Morgan dollars

    Can't grade from these scans. Could be overdipped, or an original coin. Will need photos to grade from.
     
  8. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    Scans are abysmal.......I didn't take that into account when I made my assessment. But, judging by the photog/scan, these old eyes detect 'wear' on the bodice (obverse) and breast feathers (reverse). Or maybe I should clean my glasses......
     
  9. John Skelton

    John Skelton Morgan man!

    Sorry, can't do photos at this time. You have a scan on the photo setting at 600dpi which I could increase the dpi.
     
  10. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    The resolution of the scan does not matter. It's the lighting that kills the look of the coin. If you have a modern smart phone, you will be much better off showing us a representative photo of the coin than using a scanner.

    Reading the scan, I would guess at AU-55. There is certainly some rub going down Liberty as well as on the reverse. I am guessing that the rest of the coin still retains some pretty decent luster.
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  11. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I'll go with AU-53
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  12. John Skelton

    John Skelton Morgan man!

    Sorry, you will have to work with the same picture everyone else is using. Currently, my cell phone is a little dumber than I am, but it works for me and I only have to pay about $150 a year for it. I would like to take better pictures for you, if you can wait for me to find a solution acceptable to you and others that don't cost too much and are just as easy to use. I am aware of other options, but this is the best I can do for now.
     
  13. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    No worries, I made due with the scans. Some people have phones with decent cameras and they don't realize it. I should say that even this scan is much better than some of the photo's people post that come from cameras. ;)
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  14. John Skelton

    John Skelton Morgan man!

    As I have said, this coin was graded by someone who might not be the best grade. I was surprised to see it graded MS66. That's why I think it's overgraded.
     
    thomas mozzillo likes this.
  15. Contrarian

    Contrarian New Member

    The coin was no doubt overgraded, but looks like you've got a nice D/D RPM there (FS-501).
     
  16. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    Something AU or low MS, but not a very appealing coin in pics. This date and mm is about 70% average strike quality
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page