Full Bell lines?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Brad Harris, Aug 31, 2018.

  1. Brad Harris

    Brad Harris New Member

    Going through some old coins on my grandfather's. Found this 1963-D, Franklin, 50C. Would like your opinion of the bell lines, please. The pic is probably not the best quality. My apologies...

    Thanks,

    b
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Idries Pappas

    Idries Pappas Well-Known Member

    Not FBL, in my opinion.
     
  4. Sullysullinburg

    Sullysullinburg Well-Known Member

  5. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    I also say no to FBL
     
  6. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

  7. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Definitely not FBL. While the 63D had the highest mintage, it also had a generally poor strike. Because so many of them were made, there are plenty of FBL's available - but statistically, they have a very low percentage.

    Here is an example of a 1963D that I used to own, graded NGC MS-65FBL. Noitice on my coin, both sets of lines are full and bold, except for just near the crack. There are a couple of minor tick-marks that cross the bell lines, but minor marks like this are allowed. However, both the top and bottom set of lines must be complete all the way across.

    On your coin, the lines are indistinct on the left side. This is more pronounced on the top set of lines, but the bottom set are also mushy to the left of the crack.

    JPA798 reverse (2).jpg
     
  8. TheFinn

    TheFinn Well-Known Member

    It used to be that seeing "Pass & Stow" was considered a full strike, since that is the highest part of the Bell. That didn't take into account the metal that Ben sucked up.
     
  9. *coins

    *coins Well-Known Member

    No, not FBL.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page