1958 Lincoln Cent weighs 3.37

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by dbeck22, Jul 29, 2018.

  1. dbeck22

    dbeck22 Member

    The coin is thick... It is close to the weight of a great Britain penny 3.6 and it is the same color, could it be struck on a foreign planchet? or just a thick planchet? and the coin is struck well and has sharp edges like a proof. It was bouncing between 3.37 and 3.38 and my scales are calibrated. All other coins weigh correctly
    20180729_040723.jpg
    20180729_025236.jpg 20180729_025254.jpg 20180729_025304.jpg 20180729_025319.jpg 20180729_025332_001.jpg 20180729_025343.jpg 20180729_025354.jpg 20180729_025406.jpg
     
    BigTomato and Bambam8778 like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Dave363

    Dave363 Well-Known Member

    To me I don't believe it was struck on a foreign planket I believe it's just a little extra thickness as you no there is a +/_.13.

    I think it looks like a die chip in his eye though but that could be from the pic LOL let see what other's think.
    Dave
     
  4. Bambam8778

    Bambam8778 Well-Known Member

    Nice find! Beefy little bugger! Let us know. Has the Mint ever had the foreign planchets in their possession before that this would have been possible?
     
  5. JCro57

    JCro57 Making Errors Great Again

    It is not a foreign planchet. But it does look like a rolled thick example, and in pretty decent shape.

    When the rolling presses for the metal sheets applied pressure to them, sometimes the pressure was not applied equally. If too much pressure part of the sheets would be thinner, not enough pressure would result in thicker areas.
     
  6. JCro57

    JCro57 Making Errors Great Again

    The Mint was making coins for foreign countries made on different metals and sizes even in the 1800s
     
  7. Bambam8778

    Bambam8778 Well-Known Member

    Someone mentioned the Brit penny. That was my question if they ever minted any of those.
     
    JCro57 likes this.
  8. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    Thick planchet sounds right to me.
     
    Michael K likes this.
  9. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    It's my understanding that the draw rollers did not always get the ends of the strip the correct thickness.
     
    JCro57 likes this.
  10. JCro57

    JCro57 Making Errors Great Again

    Ahhh. I know the British minted our colonial coins, but I never heard of the U.S. minting their coins nor their colonies (India, Canada, Palestine, etc.)
     
  11. Brina

    Brina Well-Known Member

    nice photo work :)
     
  12. SmokinJoe

    SmokinJoe Well-Known Member

    I think you should tell this coin to lay off the pizza.....:nurse:
     
    ldhair likes this.
  13. dbeck22

    dbeck22 Member

    thanks everyone
     
  14. dbeck22

    dbeck22 Member

    Does anyone have any advice on selling this coin? Should I put it on eBay and auction it off? Or should I get it graded?
     
  15. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    It's not worth getting graded. While it has a little value, I doubt you would make anything on it on Ebay after fees, shipping, etc. You will be losing money.
    The upper range for tolerance is 3.24 so it is a little heavy.
    Sometimes the planchets are rolled too thinly, and in this case too thickly.
    Certainly a keeper. I don't believe it has a high premium.
    I don't think we minted pennies for Great Britain, although there is a list by year and countries who we did make coins for. I don't think it's on a foreign planchet.
     
  16. Sasquatch

    Sasquatch Member

    And lets not forget the penny in Britain was the size of a half dollar in 1958.
    :angelic:
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page